Literature DB >> 16812391

Interreinforcement time, work time, and the postreinforcement pause.

D P Rider, N N Kametani.   

Abstract

Six rats were trained with food deliveries contingent upon their pressing a lever and holding it down for fixed, cumulative durations. Hold requirements were varied from 7.5 seconds to 120 seconds. Lever holding was maintained reliably at hold requirements as long as 30 seconds to 105 seconds for different rats. At longer hold requirements, lever holding was erratic and tended to occur only early in sessions. At shorter and intermediate requirements, the patterns of lever holding resembled those of responding under fixed-ratio schedules for discrete responses, with breaks in responding immediately after reinforcement alternating with relatively continuous lever holding until the next reinforcement. At longer hold requirements, postpause lever holding frequently was interrupted with additional pauses. The duration of postreinforcement pauses increased linearly with the scheduled hold requirement. However, for five of six rats, the hold requirement, which represents the actual time spent lever holding per reinforcer, accounted for somewhat less variance in pause duration than did interreinforcement time.

Entities:  

Year:  1984        PMID: 16812391      PMCID: PMC1348085          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1984.42-305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  20 in total

1.  Interlocking schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  R BERRYMAN; J A NEVIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-04       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Independence of concurrent responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  A C CATANIA
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-04       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Concurrent activity under fixed-interval reinforcement.

Authors:  B F SKINNER; W H MORSE
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1957-06

4.  Periodic reinforcement interval and number of periodic reinforcements as parameters of response strength.

Authors:  M P WILSON
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1954-02

5.  A comparison of ratio and interval reinforcement schedules with comparable interreinforcement times.

Authors:  G W Capehart; D A Eckerman; M Guilkey; R L Shull
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Concurrent fixed-interval variable-ratio schedules and the matching relation.

Authors:  D P Rider
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Response requirements as constraints on output.

Authors:  M D Zeiler; I B Buchman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  The effect of small sequential changes in fixed-ratio size upon the post-reinforcement pause.

Authors:  R W Powell
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Clock-delivered reinforcers in conjunctive and interlocking schedules.

Authors:  R B Powers
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  The post-reinforcement pause.

Authors:  M Felton; D O Lyon
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-03       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  6 in total

1.  Determinants of pigeons' waiting time: Effects of interreinforcement interval and food delay.

Authors:  K Manabe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Continuous versus discrete dimensions of reinforcement schedules: An integrative analysis.

Authors:  D C Williams; J M Johnston
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Fixed-ratio pausing: Joint effects of past reinforcer magnitude and stimuli correlated with upcoming magnitude.

Authors:  M Perone; K Courtney
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The effects of reinforcement frequency and response requirements on the maintenance of behavior.

Authors:  D P Rider; B J D'Angelo
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Intermittent reinforcement of a continuous response.

Authors:  D P Rider; N N Kametani
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Extended pausing by humans on multiple fixed-ratio schedules with varied reinforcer magnitude and response requirements.

Authors:  Dean C Williams; Kathryn J Saunders; Michael Perone
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.468

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.