Literature DB >> 16812664

Continuous versus discrete dimensions of reinforcement schedules: An integrative analysis.

D C Williams, J M Johnston.   

Abstract

An approach to reinforcement-schedule contingencies is presented that accommodates continuous as well as discrete effective dimensions of responses and reinforcers. College students' wheel turning was reinforced by projected reading material according to four schedule contingencies that incorporated either a discontinuous (count) or continuous (duration) dimension of the response and the reinforcer. The contingencies arranged a 1:1 correspondence between (a) response count and consequent stimulus count, (b) response duration and stimulus count, (c) response count and stimulus duration, and (d) response duration and stimulus duration. Contingencies incorporating response count produced moderate to high rates of very short-duration responses. Contingencies incorporating response duration produced very low-rate, long-duration responding. The dimension of the reinforcer had minimal or no additional effect. We suggest that incorporating duration and other continuous dimensions into schedule contingencies may improve our understanding of both laboratory and nonlaboratory behavior.

Year:  1992        PMID: 16812664      PMCID: PMC1322123          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1992.58-205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  29 in total

1.  Differentiating the behavior of organisms.

Authors:  G Galbicka
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Fixed-interval reinforcement of running in a wheel.

Authors:  B F Skinner; W H Morse
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1958-10       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Inhibiting function of reinforcement: magnitude effects on variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  P Harzem; C F Lowe; P J Priddle-Higson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Differentiation of press durations with upper and lower limits on reinforced values.

Authors:  D O Kuch
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Intractable properties of responding under a fixed-interval schedule.

Authors:  G D Gentry; M J Marr
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Graded differential reinforcement: Response-dependent reinforcer amount.

Authors:  G D Gentry; R T Eskew
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Interreinforcement time, work time, and the postreinforcement pause.

Authors:  D P Rider; N N Kametani
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Response duration in operant level, regular reinforcement, and extinction.

Authors:  S MARGULIES
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-10       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Intermittent reinforcement of a continuous response.

Authors:  D P Rider; N N Kametani
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Some effects of response-correlated increases in reinforcer magnitude on human behavior.

Authors:  W Buskist; J Oliveira-Castro; R Bennett
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  3 in total

1.  Discriminative control of punished stereotyped behavior in humans.

Authors:  Shannon S Doughty; Cynthia M Anderson; Adam H Doughty; Dean C Williams; Kathryn J Saunders
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Functional analysis and treatment of eye poking.

Authors:  C H Kennedy; G Souza
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1995

3.  Cocaine self-administration on a hold-down schedule of reinforcement in rats.

Authors:  Drake Morgan; Yu Liu; Erik B Oleson; David C S Roberts
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 4.530

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.