Literature DB >> 16812427

Sensitivity of time allocation to concurrent-schedule reinforcement.

M Aldiss, M Davison.   

Abstract

Four pigeons were trained on concurrent variable-interval schedules programmed on a center response key, with access to those schedules controlled by responses on left or right side keys. Two procedures were used. In one, the pigeon was given limited access, in that each side-key response produced 3-s access to a center-key schedule, and in the other procedure, access was unlimited. Data were analyzed using the generalized matching law. Comparison of sensitivities to reinforcement of interchangeover time for both procedures showed them to be of similar magnitude. Response sensitivities were also similar in magnitude for both procedures. From the limited-access procedure a second time measure that was available, switched-in time, was relatively uncontaminated by time spent emitting behavior other than key pecking. Sensitivities to reinforcement for the switched-in time measure were always smaller than interchangeover-time sensitivities for either procedure, and were approximately equal to response sensitivities for the limited-access procedure. Two other access times (5 and 7.5 s) were studied to validate the choice of 3 s as the main access time. These results indicate that when time spent emitting other behavior is excluded from interchangeover time, time and response sensitivities will be approximately equal.

Year:  1985        PMID: 16812427      PMCID: PMC1348162          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1985.44-79

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  16 in total

1.  Choice as time allocation.

Authors:  W M Baum; H C Rachlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Constituents of response rates.

Authors:  J J Pear; B L Rector
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Performance on variable-interval schedules arranged singly and concurrently.

Authors:  M C Davison; I W Hunter
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Undermatching: a reappraisal of performance on concurrent variable-interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  D L Myers; L E Myers
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Choice, rate of reinforcement, and the changeover delay.

Authors:  A Silberberg; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Performance in concurrent interval schedules.

Authors:  A J Trevett; M C Davison; R J Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Performance in concurrent interval schedules: a systematic replication.

Authors:  B Lobb; M C Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Some effects of relative reinforcement rate and changeover delay in response-independent concurrent schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  A J Brownstein; S S Pliskoff
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Formal properties of the matching law.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  2 in total

1.  Behavioral stereotypy and the generalized matching equation.

Authors:  J J Pear
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  On the measurement of time allocation on multiple variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  M Davison; L Charman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 2.468

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.