Literature DB >> 16811593

Performance in concurrent interval schedules.

A J Trevett, M C Davison, R J Williams.   

Abstract

Four pigeons were trained under concurrent variable-interval variable-interval and fixed-interval variable-interval schedules in a two-key situation. Both response allocation and time allocation to the two schedules were measured when various reinforcement rates were arranged on each key. All animals showed an approximately constant proportional preference for the variable-interval schedule over the fixed-interval schedule. These results support Schneider's (1969) analysis of fixed-interval schedule performance.

Year:  1972        PMID: 16811593      PMCID: PMC1333913          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1972.17-369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  11 in total

1.  A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  M FLESHLER; H S HOFFMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Independence of concurrent responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  A C CATANIA
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-04       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Choice as time allocation.

Authors:  W M Baum; H C Rachlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  A two-state analysis of fixed-interval responding in the pigeon.

Authors:  B A Schneider
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Concurrent responding with fixed relative rate of reinforcement.

Authors:  D A Stubbs; S S Pliskoff
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Preference for mixed-interval versus fixed-interval schedules: number of component intervals.

Authors:  M C Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  On the tautology of the matching law.

Authors:  H Rachlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Rates and patterns of responding with concurrent fixed-interval and variable-interval reinforcement.

Authors:  J A Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  On the measurement of reinforcement frequency in the study of preference.

Authors:  P Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  29 in total

1.  The effect of rate of reinforcement and time in session on preference for variability.

Authors:  Frances K McSweeney; Benjamin P Kowal; Eric S Murphy
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Earning and obtaining reinforcers under concurrent interval scheduling.

Authors:  James S MacDonall
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Timing in choice experiments.

Authors:  Jeremie Jozefowiez; Daniel T Cerutti; John E R Staddon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2005-04

4.  Practical implications of the matching law.

Authors:  J Myerson; S Hale
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1984

5.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  An analytic comparison of Herrnstein's equations and a multivariate rate equation.

Authors:  J J McDowell
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Fixed-ratio and variable-ratio schedules of brief stimuli in second-order schedules of matching to sample.

Authors:  M C Boren
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  The matching law in and within groups of rats.

Authors:  D A Graft; S E Lea; T L Whitworth
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Sensitivity of time allocation to concurrent-schedule reinforcement.

Authors:  M Aldiss; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Undermatching: a reappraisal of performance on concurrent variable-interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  D L Myers; L E Myers
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.