Literature DB >> 16812361

A temporal limit on the effect of future food on current performance in an analogue of foraging and welfare.

W Timberlake.   

Abstract

Rats obtained access to food twice each 24-hour period. The first session was a work session in which food was available on a progressive-ratio schedule. During the second session, which occurred between 1 and 23 hours after the work session, food was freely available up to a fixed total intake each 24 hours. The situation resembled elements of several real world circumstances, including the choice between continuing to forage in a rapidly depleting patch and waiting for a better patch, and between working now and receiving a guaranteed income later. The purpose of the experiment was to explore the time period over which future access to reward could affect current responding. Contrary to what might be expected from recent theorizing, anticipation of future food delayed by an hour or more after the start of the work session had no effect on current performance. Food intake was high and constant during work sessions except for a prefeeding effect that occurred when the free session closely preceded the next day's work session. Also, an increase in the difficulty of the work schedule increased the amount of work and the maximum price paid for food as if the work session were the only time food was available. The results indicate the importance of considering temporal limits in theories that require animals to integrate input over time to determine the allocation of resources among alternatives.

Entities:  

Year:  1984        PMID: 16812361      PMCID: PMC1348025          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1984.41-117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  9 in total

1.  Effects of increment size and reinforcer volume on progressive ratio performance.

Authors:  W HODOS; G KALMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Positive and negative contrast as a function of component duration for key pecking and treadle pressing.

Authors:  F K McSweeney
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The economics of daily consumption controlling food- and water-reinforced responding.

Authors:  S R Hursh
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Commitment, choice and self-control.

Authors:  H Rachlin; L Green
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem.

Authors:  E L Charnov
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 1.570

6.  Contrast, induction, facilitation, suppression, and conservation.

Authors:  J Allison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Strategies of schedule preference in chimpanzees.

Authors:  W Hodos; G H Trumbule
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Food availability and daily biological rhythms.

Authors:  Z Boulos; M Terman
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 8.989

9.  Diet optimization in a generalist herbivore: the moose.

Authors:  G E Belovsky
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 1.570

  9 in total
  19 in total

1.  Falsification of matching theory: changes in the asymptote of Herrnstein's hyperbola as a function of water deprivation.

Authors:  J J McDowell; J Dallery
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Stock optimizing in choice when a token deposit is the operant.

Authors:  J J Widholm; A Silberberg; S R Hursh; A A Imam; F R Warren-Boulton
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The magnitude-of-reinforcement function in closed and open economies.

Authors:  G Collier; D F Johnson; C Morgan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Choice in situations of time-based diminishing returns: immediate versus delayed consequences of action.

Authors:  T D Hackenberg; P N Hineline
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  On distinguishing progressively increasing response requirements for reinforcement.

Authors:  David P Jarmolowicz; Kennon A Lattal
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2010

6.  Delay and number of food reinforcers: Effects on choice and latencies.

Authors:  R L Shull; R C Mellon; J A Sharp
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Further thoughts on behavior regulation.

Authors:  W Timberlake
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Consumption-leisure tradeoffs in pigeons: Effects of changing marginal wage rates by varying amount of reinforcement.

Authors:  L Green; J H Kagel; R C Battalio
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Does satiation close the open economy?

Authors:  Diana Posadas-Sánchez; Peter R Killeen
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.986

10.  Effects of different accessibility of reinforcement schedules on choice in humans.

Authors:  U Stockhorst
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.