Literature DB >> 16812347

On the effects of food deprivation and component reinforcer rates on multiple-schedule performance.

L Charman, M Davison.   

Abstract

Six pigeons were used to investigate the effects of varying body weight and component reinforcer rates in two-component multiple variable-interval variable-interval schedules. In Parts 1 and 3 of the experiment, unequal component reinforcer rates were arranged, and body weights were respectively increased and decreased. At 80% ad lib weight, response-rate ratios were closer to unity than reinforcer-rate ratios, but at 100% or more of ad lib weight, response-rate ratios generally equaled reinforcer-rate ratios. In Part 2, component reinforcer-rate ratios were varied over five conditions with the subjects maintained at 100% or more of their ad lib weights, and response-rate ratios matched reinforcer-rate ratios. The data thus support the empirical finding that response allocation in multiple schedules is a function of deprivation. Although this qualitative result is predicted by three models of multiple-schedule performance, only a model that assumes no direct component interaction adequately describes the data.

Entities:  

Year:  1983        PMID: 16812347      PMCID: PMC1347935          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1983.40-239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  11 in total

1.  Statistical estimations in enzyme kinetics.

Authors:  G N WILKINSON
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1961-08       Impact factor: 3.857

2.  Performance on variable-interval schedules arranged singly and concurrently.

Authors:  M C Davison; I W Hunter
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Another look at contrast in multiple schedules.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Matching to relative reinforcement frequency in multiple schedules with a short component duration.

Authors:  C P Shimp; K L Wheatley
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Temporal constraint on choice: Sensitivity and bias in multiple schedules.

Authors:  A P McLean; K G White
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Component duration and relative response rates in multiple schedules.

Authors:  J C Todorov
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Hunger and contrast in a multiple schedule.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein; D H Loveland
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Behavioral competition: a mechanism for schedule interactions.

Authors:  J M Hinson; J E Staddon
Journal:  Science       Date:  1978-10-27       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  9 in total

1.  Resistance to change and the law of effect.

Authors:  D N Harper; A P McLean
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Performance in continuously available multiple schedules.

Authors:  D Elliffe; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Effects of relative reinforcer frequency on complex color detection.

Authors:  M Davison; D McCarthy
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Quantitative analysis.

Authors:  J A Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Contrast and undermatching with regular or irregular alternation of components.

Authors:  A P McLean; C F Morritt
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Closed-economy multiple-schedule performance: Effects of deprivation and session duration.

Authors:  D Elliffe; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Within-session changes in responding during concurrent schedules with different reinforcers in the components.

Authors:  F K McSweeney; S Swindell; J N Weatherly
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  The effects of component duration on multiple-schedule performance in closed and open economies.

Authors:  M H La Fiette; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  An equation for behavioral contrast.

Authors:  B A Williams; J T Wixted
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 2.468

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.