Literature DB >> 16812081

Contrast and autoshaping in multiple schedules varying reinforcer rate and duration.

B E Hamilton, A Silberberg.   

Abstract

Thirteen master pigeons were exposed to multiple schedules in which reinforcement frequency (Experiment I) or duration (Experiment II) was varied. In Phases 1 and 3 of Experiment I, the values of the first and second components' random-interval schedules were 33 and 99 seconds, respectively. In Phase 2, these values were 99 seconds for both components. In Experiment II, a random-interval 33-second schedule was associated with each component. During Phases 1 and 3, the first and second components had hopper durations of 7.5 and 2.5 seconds respectively. During Phase 2, both components' hopper durations were 2.5 seconds. In each experiment, positive contrast obtained for about half the master subjects. The rest showed a rate increase in both components (positive induction). Each master subject's key colors and reinforcers were synchronously presented on a response-independent basis to a yoked control. Richer component key-pecking occurred during each experiment's Phases 1 and 3 among half these subjects. However, none responded during the contrast condition (unchanged component of each experiment's Phase 2). From this it is inferred that autoshaping did not contribute to the contrast and induction findings among master birds. Little evidence of local contrast (highest rate at beginning of richer component) was found in any subject. These data show that (a) contrast can occur independently from autoshaping, (b) contrast assays during equal-valued components may produce induction, (c) local contrast in multiple schedules often does not occur, and (d) differential hopper durations can produce autoshaping and contrast.

Year:  1978        PMID: 16812081      PMCID: PMC1332737          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1978.30-107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  36 in total

1.  Work decrement and reminiscence in pigeon operant responding.

Authors:  C A BONEAU; S AXELROD
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1962-10

2.  Behavioral contrast.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Relativity of response rate and reinforcement frequency in a multiple schedule.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-04       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Interactions in multiple schedules: the role of the stimulus-reinforcer contingency.

Authors:  R D Spealman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Behavioral contrast in pigeons depends upon the operant.

Authors:  N S Hemmes
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1973-10

Review 6.  Pavlovian conditioning and its proper control procedures.

Authors:  R A Rescorla
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck.

Authors:  P L Brown; H M Jenkins
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  The course, relations and distribution of the inferior alveolar nerve and its branches in the cat.

Authors:  P P Robinson
Journal:  Anat Rec       Date:  1979-10

9.  Effects of reinforcement magnitude on choice and rate of responding.

Authors:  A J Neuringer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  An analysis of contrast effects in multiple schedules.

Authors:  J A Nevin; S J Shettleworth
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-07       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  7 in total

1.  Three versions of the additive theories of behavioral contrast.

Authors:  F K McSweeney; R H Ettinger; W D Norman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Contrast and undermatching as a function of reinforcer duration and quality during multiple schedules.

Authors:  R H Ettinger; F K McSweeney; W D Norman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Incentive processes and the peak shift.

Authors:  S J Weiss; R J Dacanay
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The generalized matching law as a description of multiple-schedule responding.

Authors:  F K McSweeney; V A Farmer; J D Dougan; J E Whipple
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Defining behavioral contrast for multiple schedules.

Authors:  F K McSweeney; W D Norman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  The Emergence of Stimulus Relations: Human and Computer Learning.

Authors:  Chris Ninness; Sharon K Ninness; Marilyn Rumph; David Lawson
Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci       Date:  2017-11-13

7.  Translations in Stimulus-Stimulus Pairing: Autoshaping of Learner Vocalizations.

Authors:  Stephanie P da Silva; April Michele Williams
Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci       Date:  2019-11-25
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.