Literature DB >> 16812001

Two types of pigeon key pecking: suppression of long- but not short-duration key pecks by duration-dependent shock.

B Schwartz.   

Abstract

The key pecking of eight pigeons was maintained on a variable-interval 1-minute schedule of food reinforcement. Sometimes, all responses between 35 and 50 milliseconds in duration produced a shock; sometimes, all responses between 10 and 25 milliseconds produced a shock; sometimes, shocks were produced by pecks without regard to duration (nondifferential punishment), and sometimes shocks were delivered independently of responding. Punishment of 35- to 50-millisecond responses selectively suppressed those responses, while punishment of 10- to 25-millisecond responses and nondifferential punishment suppressed responding overall but did not suppress responses of particular duration. Punishment of 35- to 50-millisecond responses suppressed key pecking slightly less than did nondifferential punishment. Punishment of 10- to 25-millisecond responses and response-independent shock produced roughly equal amounts of suppression, substantially less than the other punishment procedures. The data support the view that there are at least two kinds of key peck, identifiable on the basis of duration, one of which (short duration) is insensitive to its consequences.

Year:  1977        PMID: 16812001      PMCID: PMC1333603          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1977.27-393

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  4 in total

1.  Aversive control with the pigeon.

Authors:  H S HOFFMAN; M FLESHLER
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1959-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Two different kinds of key peck in the pigeon: some properties of responses maintained by negative and positive response-reinforcer contingencies.

Authors:  B Schwartz; D R Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Behavioral contrast in the pigeon: a study of the duration of key pecking maintained on multiple schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  B Schwartz; B Hamilton; A Silberberg
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Auto-maintenance in the pigeon: sustained pecking despite contingent non-reinforcement.

Authors:  D R Williams; H Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 2.468

  4 in total
  6 in total

1.  Development of complex, stereotyped behavior in pigeons.

Authors:  B Schwartz
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Three versions of the additive theories of behavioral contrast.

Authors:  F K McSweeney; R H Ettinger; W D Norman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  On the role of "memory" in the analysis of behavior.

Authors:  M N Branch
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Psychophysics of key-peck duration in the pigeon.

Authors:  M D Zeiler; E R Davis; A J Decasper
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Behavioral contrast and the automaintained key peck.

Authors:  R K Wesp; K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Changeover delay effects on topographically tagged discriminative behavior.

Authors:  K G White
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 2.468

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.