Literature DB >> 16812243

Stimulus control of delayed matching in pigeons: Directed forgetting.

D F Kendrick, M Rilling, T B Stonebraker.   

Abstract

Pigeons were trained in delayed matching-to-sample with two postsample stimuli. A postsample R-cue signaled that a matching choice phase would follow. A postsample F-cue signaled that a matching choice phase would not follow. Previous research found reduced matching accuracy on F-cued probe trials when comparison stimuli were presented in the choice phase. The present four experiments systematically varied the events following an F-cue to determine the conditions under which the F-cue reduces delayed-matching accuracy. When F-cues and R-cues controlled different behavior, matching on probe trials was poor. When both cues controlled the same behavior, matching on probe trials was good. This result is best explained by the theory that comparison stimuli retrieve the sample representation, but only in the behavioral context established by the R-cue. The present research supports the view that response-produced stimuli serve a contextual role in animal short-term memory.

Year:  1981        PMID: 16812243      PMCID: PMC1333071          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1981.36-241

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  10 in total

1.  Delayed matching in the pigeon.

Authors:  D S BLOUGH
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1959-04       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Complex learning and information processing by pigeons: a critical analysis.

Authors:  D E Carter; T J Werner
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Organization in memory and behavior.

Authors:  C P Shimp
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Short-term memory in the pigeon: stimulus-response associations.

Authors:  C P Shimp; M Moffitt
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Conditioning of two-response patterns of key pecking in pigeons.

Authors:  R J Grayson; E A Wasserman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Discrimination learning without short-term memory: dissociation of memory processes in pigeons.

Authors:  W S Maki
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-04-06       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  A quantitative analysis of the responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  A C Catania; G S Reynolds
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Stimulus similarity and retroactive interference and facilitation in monkey short-term memory.

Authors:  D L Medin; T J Reynolds; J K Parkinson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1980-04

9.  Delay-interval illumination changes interfere with pigeon short-term memory.

Authors:  D K Tranberg; M Rilling
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Number of responses as a stimulus in fixed interval and fixed ratio schedules.

Authors:  M Rilling
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1967-02
  10 in total
  11 in total

1.  Nonverbal Working Memory for Novel Images in Rhesus Monkeys.

Authors:  Ryan J Brady; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Characteristics of forgetting functions in delayed matching to sample.

Authors:  K G White
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Irrelevance of sample stimuli and directed forgetting in pigeons.

Authors:  D S Grant; R C Barnet
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Use of an ambiguous-sample procedure to establish a cue to forget in pigeons.

Authors:  D S Grant
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Directed forgetting of elements in compound samples.

Authors:  M Jitsumori; J Taneya; J Kikawa
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Nonverbal working memory of humans and monkeys: rehearsal in the sketchpad?

Authors:  D A Washburn; R S Astur
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-03

7.  Cognitive control of working memory but not familiarity in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Emily Kathryn Brown; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.986

8.  Most directed forgetting in pigeons can be attributed to the absence of reinforcement on forget trials during training or to other procedural artifacts.

Authors:  T R Zentall; K L Roper; L M Sherburne
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Control of Working Memory in Rhesus Monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Hsiao-Wei Tu; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.478

10.  Defining the stimulus--a memoir.

Authors:  Herbert Terrace
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 1.777

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.