Literature DB >> 19969047

Defining the stimulus--a memoir.

Herbert Terrace1.   

Abstract

The eminent psychophysicist, S.S. Stevens, once remarked that, "the basic problem of psychology was the definition of the stimulus" (Stevens, 1951, p. 46). By expanding the traditional definition of the stimulus, the study of animal learning has metamorphosed into animal cognition. The main impetus for that change was the recognition that it is often necessary to postulate a representation between the traditional S and R of learning theory. Representations allow a subject to represent a stimulus it learned previously that is currently absent. Thus, in delayed matching-to-sample, one has to assume that a subject responds to a representation of the sample during test if it responds correctly. Other examples, to name but a few, include concept formation, spatial memory, serial memory, learning a numerical rule, imitation and metacognition. Whereas a representation used to be regarded as a mentalistic phenomenon that was unworthy of scientific inquiry, it can now be operationally defined. To accommodate representations, the traditional discriminative stimulus has to be expanded to allow for the role of representations. The resulting composite can account for a significantly larger portion of the variance of performance measures than the exteroceptive stimulus could by itself. Copyright 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19969047      PMCID: PMC2832120          DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2009.12.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  28 in total

1.  Representation of the numerosities 1-9 by rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  E M Brannon; H S Terrace
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2000-01

2.  WAVELENGTH GENERALIZATION AFTER DISCRIMINATION LEARNING WITH AND WITHOUT ERRORS.

Authors:  H S TERRACE
Journal:  Science       Date:  1964-04-03       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Generalization gradients of inhibition following auditory discrimination learning.

Authors:  H M JENKINS; R H HARRISON
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Auto-maintenance in the pigeon: sustained pecking despite contingent non-reinforcement.

Authors:  D R Williams; H Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Fear conditioning drives profilin into amygdala dendritic spines.

Authors:  Raphael Lamprecht; Claudia R Farb; Sarina M Rodrigues; Joseph E LeDoux
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-03-19       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck.

Authors:  P L Brown; H M Jenkins
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Teaching sign language to a chimpanzee.

Authors:  R A Gardner; B T Gardner
Journal:  Science       Date:  1969-08-15       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Language in chimpanzee?

Authors:  D Premack
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-05-21       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Discrimination learning and inhibition.

Authors:  H S Terrace
Journal:  Science       Date:  1966-12-30       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Serial expertise of rhesus macaques.

Authors:  Herbert S Terrace; Lisa K Son; Elizabeth M Brannon
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2003-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.