Literature DB >> 16812631

Irrelevance of sample stimuli and directed forgetting in pigeons.

D S Grant, R C Barnet.   

Abstract

A successive matching procedure was used to investigate which aspect of the test-omission procedure is responsible for establishing a postsample stimulus as a cue to forget in pigeons. It was found that a postsample stimulus that reliably followed a sample that was irrelevant to performance functioned as a cue to forget. This result was obtained regardless of whether termination of that postsample stimulus was followed by reinforcement or by the presentation of sample-independent discriminative stimuli. It was also found that a postsample stimulus that functioned as a cue to forget at the beginning of training lost that function when it was repeatedly presented on trials in which the sample was relevant to performance. These findings reveal that (a) neither a reduction in reinforcement rate nor the omission of the opportunity for discriminated responding is necessary to establish an effective cue to forget and (b) irrelevance of the sample to performance is a sufficient condition to establish a cue to forget. These results suggest that a postsample stimulus that is presented on trials in which remembering the sample is not reinforced differentially will come to set the occasion for not remembering the sample.

Year:  1991        PMID: 16812631      PMCID: PMC1322980          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1991.55-97

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  3 in total

1.  Temporal factors influencing the pigeon's successive matching-to-sample performance: sample duration, intertrial interval, and retention interval.

Authors:  K R Nelson; E A Wasserman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Stimulus control of delayed matching in pigeons: Directed forgetting.

Authors:  D F Kendrick; M Rilling; T B Stonebraker
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Use of an ambiguous-sample procedure to establish a cue to forget in pigeons.

Authors:  D S Grant
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 2.468

  3 in total
  5 in total

1.  Directed forgetting of elements in compound samples.

Authors:  M Jitsumori; J Taneya; J Kikawa
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Cognitive control of working memory but not familiarity in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Emily Kathryn Brown; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Directed forgetting in rats: Evidence for active memory control?

Authors:  Chiaki Tanaka; Hayato Yahagi; Tohru Taniuchi
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  Most directed forgetting in pigeons can be attributed to the absence of reinforcement on forget trials during training or to other procedural artifacts.

Authors:  T R Zentall; K L Roper; L M Sherburne
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Control of Working Memory in Rhesus Monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Hsiao-Wei Tu; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.478

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.