Literature DB >> 16812219

Selective punishment of interresponse times.

G Galbicka, M N Branch.   

Abstract

Lever pressing by two squirrel monkeys was maintained under a variable-interval 60-second schedule of food presentation. When response-dependent electric shock was made contingent on comparatively long interresponse times, response rate increased, and further increases were obtained when the minimum interresponse-time requirement was decreased. When an equal proportion of responses produced shock without regard to interresponse time, rates decreased. Thus, shock contingent on long interresponse times selectively decreased the relative frequency of those interresponse times, and increased the relative frequency of shorter interresponse times, whereas shock delivered independent of interresponse times decreased the relative frequency of shorter interresponse times while increasing the frequency of longer ones. The results provide preliminary evidence that interresponse times may be differentiated by punishment, further supporting the notion that interresponse times may be considered functional units of behavior.

Year:  1981        PMID: 16812219      PMCID: PMC1333086          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1981.35-311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  31 in total

1.  The dependence of interresponse times upon the relative reinforcement of different interresponse times.

Authors:  D ANGER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1956-09

2.  Punishment. I. The avoidance hypothesis.

Authors:  J A DINSMOOR
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1954-01       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Time-allocation, matching, and contrast.

Authors:  C P Shimp; L Hawkes
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Escape, avoidance, punishment: where do we stand?

Authors:  J A Dinsmoor
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Interresponse-time shaping by variable-interval-like interresponse-time reinforcement contingencies.

Authors:  J R Platt
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Operant behavior in the morphine-dependent rhesus monkey.

Authors:  S G Holtzman; J E Villarreal
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 4.030

7.  A quantitative analysis of the responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  A C Catania; G S Reynolds
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Magnitude and frequency of reinforcement and frequencies of interresponse times.

Authors:  C P Shimp
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Probabilistically reinforced choice behavior in pigeons.

Authors:  C P Shimp
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-07       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Variable-interval punishment during variable-interval reinforcement.

Authors:  Y Filby; J B Appel
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  On the status of knowledge for using punishment implications for treating behavior disorders.

Authors:  Dorothea C Lerman; Christina M Vorndran
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2002

2.  Molecular contingencies in schedules of intermittent punishment.

Authors:  J L Arbuckle; K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Selective punishment of interresponse times: The roles of shock intensity and scheduling.

Authors:  O J Sizemore; F R Maxwell
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Differentiating the behavior of organisms.

Authors:  G Galbicka
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Behavior dynamics: One perspective.

Authors:  M J Marr
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  An interresponse-time analysis of responding maintained by schedules of response-produced electric shock.

Authors:  L L Howell; L D Byrd; M J Marr
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Effects of ratio contingencies on responding maintained by schedules of electric-shock presentation (response-produced shock).

Authors:  M N Branch; S I Dworkin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  A role for negative reinforcement of response omission in punishment?

Authors:  J L Arbuckle; K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Preference for less frequent shock under fixed-interval schedules of electric-shock presentation.

Authors:  R C Pitts; E F Malagodi
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Suppressive and facilitative effects of shock intensity and interresponse times followed by shock.

Authors:  Jessica B Everly; Michael Perone
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.