Literature DB >> 16812501

A role for negative reinforcement of response omission in punishment?

J L Arbuckle, K A Lattal.   

Abstract

This experiment attempted to disentangle response-rate reductions controlled by the direct suppressive effects of a punisher from those due to negative reinforcement of response omission. Key-peck responding of pigeons was maintained by a conjoint variable-interval 3-min schedule of food presentation variable-interval 30-s schedule of response-dependent electric shock presentation. Omission of responses for 5, 10, or 30 s resulted in the possibility of canceling a scheduled shock. Response rates were a function of required pause duration, with lower rates occurring when longer periods of response omission were required for shock cancellation. These results show that, with several parameters of punishment held constant, response rates were controlled by the negative reinforcement contingency. Such a finding argues for renewed consideration of the role of negative reinforcement in punishment contingencies.

Entities:  

Year:  1987        PMID: 16812501      PMCID: PMC1338763          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1987.48-407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  13 in total

1.  STIMULUS ASPECTS OF AVERSIVE CONTROLS: THE EFFECTS OF RESPONSE CONTINGENT SHOCK.

Authors:  H S HOFFMAN; M FLESHLER
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1965-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  MOTIVATIONAL ASPECTS OF ESCAPE FROM PUNISHMENT.

Authors:  N H AZRIN; D F HAKE; W C HOLZ; R R HUTCHINSON
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1965-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Punishment. II. An interpretation of empirical findings.

Authors:  J A DINSMOOR
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1955-03       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  M FLESHLER; H S HOFFMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Some behavioral effects of a concurrently positive and negative stimulus.

Authors:  E HEARST; M SIDMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  A technique for delivering shock to pigeons.

Authors:  N H AZRIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1959-04       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Punishment. I. The avoidance hypothesis.

Authors:  J A DINSMOOR
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1954-01       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Escape, avoidance, punishment: where do we stand?

Authors:  J A Dinsmoor
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Response control with titration of punishment.

Authors:  H Rachlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Selective punishment of interresponse times.

Authors:  G Galbicka; M N Branch
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  3 in total

1.  A suggestion for describing combinations of response-dependent and response-independent events.

Authors:  A A Imam; K A Lattal
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1992

2.  Molecular contingencies in schedules of intermittent punishment.

Authors:  J L Arbuckle; K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Suppressive and facilitative effects of shock intensity and interresponse times followed by shock.

Authors:  Jessica B Everly; Michael Perone
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.468

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.