Literature DB >> 16812211

Effects of chlordiazepoxide and d-amphetamine on responding suppressed by conditioned punishment.

J O Valentine, J E Barrett.   

Abstract

Key pecking by two pigeons, maintained under a variable-interval two-minute schedule of food presentation, was suppressed when each response produced a five-second visual stimulus that was occasionally paired with shock. Stimulus-shock pairings occurred independently of responding according to a variable-time six-minute schedule for one bird or once per session for the other bird. The effects of chlordiazepoxide and d-amphetamine were assessed on this baseline of behavior suppressed by conditioned punishment. Chlordiazepoxide produced dose-related increases in the rate of punished responding, whereas d-amphetamine produced only decreases. In addition, chlordiazepoxide produced dose-related increases in response rate during the response-produced and response-independent stimulus presentations; d-amphetamine, however, only decreased responding during stimulus presentations.

Entities:  

Year:  1981        PMID: 16812211      PMCID: PMC1333039          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1981.35-209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  11 in total

1.  Comparison of drug effects on responding punished by pressurized air or electric shock delivery in squirrel monkeys: pentobarbital, chlordiazepoxide, d-amphetamine and cocaine.

Authors:  R D Spealman
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 4.030

2.  CONDITIONED PUNISHMENT.

Authors:  D F HAKE; N H AZRIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1965-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Fixed-ratio punishment.

Authors:  N H AZRIN; W C HOLZ; D F HAKE
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  A technique for delivering shock to pigeons.

Authors:  N H AZRIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1959-04       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  A second type of superstition in the pigeon.

Authors:  W H MORSE; B F SKINNER
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1957-06

6.  Determinants of drug effects on punished responding.

Authors:  D E McMillan
Journal:  Fed Proc       Date:  1975-08

7.  A comparison of the punishing effects of response-produced shock and response-produced time out.

Authors:  D E McMillan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Differential attenuation of two kinds of conditioned suppression by d-amphetamine and pentobarbital.

Authors:  K A Miczek; D Luttinger
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 4.030

9.  Drugs and punished responding. V. Effects of drugs on responding suppressed by response-dependent and response-independent electric shock.

Authors:  D E McMillan; J D Leander
Journal:  Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther       Date:  1975-01

10.  Punishment-specific effects of pentobarbital: dependency on the type of punisher.

Authors:  M N Branch; G Nicholson; S I Dworkin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  2 in total

1.  Response suppression by visual stimuli paired with postsession d-amphetamine injections in the pigeon.

Authors:  J R Glowa; J E Barrett
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Effects of chlordiazepoxide, morphine and amphetamine on responding suppressed by different levels of electric shock in the pigeon are rate dependent.

Authors:  J L Evenden
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.530

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.