Literature DB >> 4963564

A comparison of the punishing effects of response-produced shock and response-produced time out.

D E McMillan.   

Abstract

Electric shock and time out were compared as punishers in the squirrel monkey. At the parameters investigated, both suppressed responding to about the same degree. Scheduling punishment intermittently or administering pentobarbital reduced the effectiveness of both punishers. The effects of the punishers were different in that responding suppressed by shock recovered more within a session than responding suppressed by time out. Responding was suppressed after some shock-punishment components, but less often after time-out-punishment components. The similarities of the two punishers were more striking than the differences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1967        PMID: 4963564      PMCID: PMC1338408          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1967.10-439

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  16 in total

1.  ESCAPE BEHAVIOR UNDER DIFFERENT FIXED RATIOS AND SHOCK INTENSITIES.

Authors:  E WINOGRAD
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1965-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Punishment. II. An interpretation of empirical findings.

Authors:  J A DINSMOOR
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1955-03       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  An apparatus for delivering pain shock to monkevs.

Authors:  D F HAKE; N H AZRIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  A comparison of several procedures for eliminating behavior.

Authors:  W C HOLZ; N H AZRIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Elimination of behavior of mental patients by response-produced extinction.

Authors:  W C HOLZ; N H AZRIN; T AYLLON
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Commercial liquid diet for animals in behavioral studies.

Authors:  T ELLISON; W C RIDDLE
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-10       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Suppression of a performance under differential reinforcement of low rates by a pre-time-out stimulus.

Authors:  C B FERSTER
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1960-04       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Effects of punishment intensity during variable-interval reinforcement.

Authors:  N H AZRIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1960-04       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Schedules using noxious stimuli. II: low intensity electric shock as a discriminative stimulus.

Authors:  D E McMillan; W H Morse
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 10.  Is time-out from positive reinforcement an aversive event? A review of the experimental evidence.

Authors:  H Leitenberg
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1965-12       Impact factor: 17.737

View more
  16 in total

1.  Stimulus control and generalization of point-loss punishment with humans.

Authors:  J O'Donnell; J Crosbie; D C Williams; K J Saunders
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 2.  On the status of knowledge for using punishment implications for treating behavior disorders.

Authors:  Dorothea C Lerman; Christina M Vorndran
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2002

3.  Timeout as a punishing stimulus in continuous and intermittent schedules.

Authors:  H B Clark; T Rowbury; A M Baer; D M Baer
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1973

4.  An analysis of timeout and response cost in a programmed environment.

Authors:  J D Burchard; F Barrera
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1972

5.  Effects of timeout on spaced responding in pigeons.

Authors:  T J Kramer; M Rilling
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Signalled and unsignalled percentage reinforcement of performance under a chained schedule.

Authors:  M N Branch
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Response-produced timeouts under a progressive-ratio schedule with a punished reset option.

Authors:  J F Dardano
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Response-dependent and response-independent timeout from an avoidance schedule.

Authors:  A Baron; I A Trenholme
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-07       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Avoidance of timeout from response-independent reinforcement.

Authors:  T D'Andrea
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-05       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  The effects of diazepam and triazolam on repeated acquisition and performance of response sequences with an observing response.

Authors:  W K Bickel; S T Higgins; J R Hughes
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.