Literature DB >> 16812085

Performance of rats under concurrent variable-interval schedules of negative reinforcement.

A Poling.   

Abstract

The behavior of rats under concurrent variable-interval schedules of negative reinforcement was examined. A single one-minute variable-interval programmer determined the availability of 30-second timeouts from electric shock. These were assigned to one or the other of the two component schedules with a probability of 0 to 1.0. The response requirement for the component schedules was standing to the right or left of the center of the experimental chamber. With a six-second changeover delay, the relative time spent under one component schedule varied directly and linearly with the relative number of timeouts earned under that component schedule. The absolute number of changeovers was highest when a similar number of timeouts was earned under each component schedule, and lowest when all or nearly all timeouts were earned under one component schedule. In general, these relations are similar to those reported with concurrent variable-interval schedules of positive reinforcement.

Entities:  

Year:  1978        PMID: 16812085      PMCID: PMC1332729          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1978.30-31

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  9 in total

1.  Concurrent performances: reinforcement interaction and response independence.

Authors:  A C CATANIA
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  M FLESHLER; H S HOFFMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Some limitations on behavioral contrast and induction during successive discrimination.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Choice as time allocation.

Authors:  W M Baum; H C Rachlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Concurrent responding with fixed relative rate of reinforcement.

Authors:  D A Stubbs; S S Pliskoff
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Matching and contrast on several concurrent treadle-press schedules.

Authors:  F K McSweeney
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Some effects of relative reinforcement rate and changeover delay in response-independent concurrent schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  A J Brownstein; S S Pliskoff
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Time allocation and negative reinforcement.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 2.468

  9 in total
  6 in total

1.  The general matching law describes choice on concurrent variable-interval schedules of wheel-running reinforcement.

Authors:  T W Belke; J Belliveau
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Concurrent avoidance of shocks by pigeons pecking a key.

Authors:  E A De Moraes Ferrari; J C Todorov
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Concurrent schedules of positive and negative reinforcement: differential-impact and differential-outcomes hypotheses.

Authors:  Michael A Magoon; Thomas S Critchfield
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Concurrent variable-ratio schedules: Implications for the generalized matching law.

Authors:  J S Macdonall
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Choice, experience, and the generalized matching law.

Authors:  J C Todorov; J M de Oliveira Castro; E S Hanna; M C Bittencourt de Sa; M Q Barreto
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Matching since Baum (1979).

Authors:  J H Wearden; I S Burgess
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 2.468

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.