Literature DB >> 16811839

Matching and contrast on several concurrent treadle-press schedules.

F K McSweeney.   

Abstract

Four White King pigeons pressed treadles for food reinforcement on several concurrent variable-interval variable-interval schedules. The rate of reinforcement available for responding in one of the two component schedules was held constant at 30 reinforcers per hour. The rate of reinforcement available for responding in the other was varied from 120 to 60 to 15, and then to 30 reinforcers per hour. The relative rate of responding in each component schedule equalled the relative rate of reinforcement that the component provided. And, behavioral contrast, defined as an inverse relationship between the rate of responding in the constant component and the rate of reinforcement obtained by responding in the other component, occurred for all schedules.

Year:  1975        PMID: 16811839      PMCID: PMC1333339          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1975.23-193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  11 in total

1.  Concurrent performances: reinforcement interaction and response independence.

Authors:  A C CATANIA
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  M FLESHLER; H S HOFFMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Behavioral contrast.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Preference and Switching under Concurrent Scheduling.

Authors:  J D Findley
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1958-04       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  A yoked-chamber comparison of concurrent and multiple schedules.

Authors:  P Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Failure to obtain positive contrast when pigeons press a bar.

Authors:  R F Westbrook
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Choice behavior and the accessibility of the reinforcer.

Authors:  E Fantino; N Squires; N Delbrück; C Peterson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Effects of reinforcement rate and reinforcer magnitude on choice behavior of humans.

Authors:  D R Schmitt
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck.

Authors:  P L Brown; H M Jenkins
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  14 in total

1.  Independence of response force and reinforcement rate on concurrent variable-interval schedule performance.

Authors:  I Hunter; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  The effects of different component response requirements in multiple and concurrent schedules.

Authors:  M Davison; A Ferguson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Matching, contrast, and equalizing in the concurrent lever-press responding of rats.

Authors:  W D Norman; F K McSweeney
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Sensitivity to reinforcement in concurrent arithmetic and exponential schedules.

Authors:  R Taylor; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Performance of rats under concurrent variable-interval schedules of negative reinforcement.

Authors:  A Poling
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  A comparison of the key-peck and treadle-press operants in the pigeon: differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate schedule of reinforcement.

Authors:  W K Richardson; D B Clark
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Reinforcement and punishment effects in concurrent schedules: A test of two models.

Authors:  J Farley
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Concurrent second-order schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  S L Cohen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Matching-based hedonic scaling in the pigeon.

Authors:  H L Miller
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Choice performance in several concurrent key-peck treadle-press reinforcement schedules.

Authors:  K L Wheatley; L A Engberg
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.