Literature DB >> 16811863

Time allocation on concurrent schedules with asymmetrical response requirements.

R A Bauman, R L Shull, A J Brownstein.   

Abstract

Pigeons were trained on concurrent schedules in which key pecking was required by both schedules (concurrent variable-interval variable-interval schedules) and on concurrent schedules in which key pecking was required by only one of the schedules (concurrent variable-interval variable-time schedules). The distribution of reinforcements was systematically varied with both types of concurrent schedules. The distribution of time between the schedules depended on the reinforcement distribution and was independent of the symmetry of the response requirement. The relation between time and reinforcement distributions appears to be invariant over a wide range of manipulations of responding maintained by concurrent schedules.

Year:  1975        PMID: 16811863      PMCID: PMC1333380          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1975.24-53

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  10 in total

1.  Choice as time allocation.

Authors:  W M Baum; H C Rachlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Preference and Switching under Concurrent Scheduling.

Authors:  J D Findley
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1958-04       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Concurrent responding with fixed relative rate of reinforcement.

Authors:  D A Stubbs; S S Pliskoff
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Preference for qualitatively different reinforcers.

Authors:  V Hollard; M C Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Concurrent schedules of response-independent reinforcement: duration of a reinforcing stimulus.

Authors:  A J Brownstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Some effects of relative reinforcement rate and changeover delay in response-independent concurrent schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  A J Brownstein; S S Pliskoff
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Variable-time reinforcement in multiple and concurrent schedules.

Authors:  D M Wilkie
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  A quantitative analysis of the responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  A C Catania; G S Reynolds
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Changeover delay and concurrent schedules: some effects on relative performance measures.

Authors:  R L Shull; S S Pliskoff
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 2.468

  10 in total
  7 in total

1.  A suggestion for describing combinations of response-dependent and response-independent events.

Authors:  A A Imam; K A Lattal
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1992

2.  Response and time allocation in concurrent second-order schedules.

Authors:  P G Beautrais; M C Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Time-allocation matching between punishing situations.

Authors:  M Z Deluty; R M Church
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Matching under concurrent fixed-ratio variable-interval schedules of food presentation.

Authors:  A V Bacotti
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Inter-response-time reinforcement and relative reinforcer frequency control choice.

Authors:  Takayuki Tanno; Alan Silberberg
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Choice, experience, and the generalized matching law.

Authors:  J C Todorov; J M de Oliveira Castro; E S Hanna; M C Bittencourt de Sa; M Q Barreto
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Matching, undermatching, and overmatching in studies of choice.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.468

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.