Literature DB >> 16795840

Preference for reinforcers under varying schedule arrangements: A behavioral economic analysis.

R D Tustin1.   

Abstract

The field of behavioral economics combines concepts from economics and operant conditioning to examine the influence of schedules or price on preference for reinforcers. Three case studies are reported in which behavioral economic analyses were used to assess relative preference for reinforcers shown by people with intellectual disabilities when schedule requirements varied. The studies examined (a) preference for different reinforcers, (b) substitutability of reinforcers, and (c) changes in preference as a function of schedule requirements.

Entities:  

Year:  1994        PMID: 16795840      PMCID: PMC1297846          DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-597

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal        ISSN: 0021-8855


  20 in total

1.  Toward empirical behavior laws. I. positive reinforcement.

Authors:  D PREMACK
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1959-07       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Effects of reinforcer rate and reinforcer quality on time allocation: Extensions of matching theory to educational settings.

Authors:  N A Neef
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1992

3.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Behavioral economics.

Authors:  S R Hursh
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Response deprivation, reinforcement, and economics.

Authors:  James Allison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Some motivational properties of sensory stimulation in psychotic children.

Authors:  A Rincover; C D Newsom; O I Lovaas; R L Koegel
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  1977-10

7.  Unit price as a useful metric in analyzing effects of reinforcer magnitude.

Authors:  R J DeGrandpre; W K Bickel; J R Hughes; M P Layng; G Badger
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals.

Authors:  G M Pace; M T Ivancic; G L Edwards; B A Iwata; T J Page
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1985

9.  Evaluation of reinforcer preferences for profoundly handicapped students.

Authors:  D P Wacker; W K Berg; B Wiggins; M Muldoon; J Cavanaugh
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1985

10.  The limits and motivating potential of sensory stimuli as reinforcers for autistic children.

Authors:  M Ferrari; S L Harris
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1981
View more
  25 in total

1.  Integrating basic and applied research and the utility of Lattal and Perone's Handbook of research methods in human operant behavior.

Authors:  R Stromer
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2000

2.  Examination of relative reinforcement effects of stimuli identified through pretreatment and daily brief preference assessments.

Authors:  I G DeLeon; W W Fisher; V Rodriguez-Catter; K Maglieri; K Herman; J M Marhefka
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2001

3.  Choices between positive and negative reinforcement during treatment for escape-maintained behavior.

Authors:  I G DeLeon; P L Neidert; B M Anders; V Rodriguez-Catter
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2001

4.  Reinforcement contingencies and social reinforcement: some reciprocal relations between basic and applied research.

Authors:  T R Vollmer; T D Hackenberg
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2001

5.  Assessing reinforcers under progressive schedule requirements.

Authors:  H S Roane; D C Lerman; C M Vorndran
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2001

6.  Preference for fluent versus disfluent work schedules.

Authors:  Daniel M Fienup; Ashley A Ahlers; Gary Pace
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2011

7.  A preliminary analysis of adaptive responding under open and closed economies.

Authors:  Henry S Roane; Nathan A Call; Terry S Falcomata
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2005

8.  Assessing preference for reinforcers using demand curves, work-rate functions, and expansion paths.

Authors:  R D Tustin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Evaluation of absolute and relative reinforcer value using progressive-ratio schedules.

Authors:  Monica T Francisco; John C Borrero; Jolene R Sy
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2008

10.  Further examination of factors that influence preference for positive versus negative reinforcement.

Authors:  Tiffany Kodak; Dorothea C Lerman; Valerie M Volkert; Nicole Trosclair
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2007
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.