Literature DB >> 16811644

Comparisons between variable-interval and fixed-interval schedules of electric shock delivery.

N Hymowitz.   

Abstract

Responding maintained in rats under a variable-interval 35-sec food schedule was suppressed more by 60-sec and 240-sec fixed-interval schedules of shock delivery than by 60-sec and 240-sec variable-interval schedules of shock delivery. When the delivery of shock was preceded by a 5-sec visual stimulus, little overall response suppression was found with either fixed-interval or variable-interval schedules. In a third experiment, the percentage of occasions on which a cue preceded each shock delivery was varied from 0% to 100%. For the fixed-interval shock condition, the most suppression occurred with the 0% treatment, the least with 100%, and an intermediate amount with the 50% treatment. For the variable-interval groups, the most suppression occurred in the 50% condition, the least in the 100% group, and an intermediate amount with 0%.

Entities:  

Year:  1973        PMID: 16811644      PMCID: PMC1334056          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1973.19-101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  9 in total

1.  APERIODICITY AS A FACTOR IN CHOICE.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Discriminative properties of punishment.

Authors:  W C HOLZ; N H AZRIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The acquisition of observing responses in the absence of differential external reinforcement.

Authors:  W F PROKASY
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1956-04

4.  The role of observing responses in discrimination learning.

Authors:  L B WYCKOFF
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1952-11       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Preference for mixed- versus fixed-ratio schedules.

Authors:  E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Schedules using noxious stimuli. III. Responding maintained with response-produced electric shocks.

Authors:  R T Kelleher; W H Morse
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Chronic fear produced by unpredictable electric shock.

Authors:  M E Seligman
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1968-10

8.  Conditions affecting acquisition of observing responses in the absence of differential reward.

Authors:  K M Mitchell; N P Perkins; C C Perkins
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1965-12

9.  Response suppression and recovery under some temporally defined schedules of intermittent punishment.

Authors:  D P Ferraro
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1967-08
  9 in total
  4 in total

1.  Effects on responding of mixed and multiple schedules of signalled and unsignalled response-dependent electric-shock delivery.

Authors:  N Hymowitz
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Effects of signaled and unsignaled shock on schedule-controlled lever pressing and schedule-induced licking: Shock intensity and body weight.

Authors:  N Hymowitz
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Neural correlates of unconditioned response diminution during Pavlovian conditioning.

Authors:  Joseph E Dunsmoor; Peter A Bandettini; David C Knight
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-12-08       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Impaired Pavlovian fear extinction is a common phenotype across genetic lineages of the 129 inbred mouse strain.

Authors:  M Camp; M Norcross; N Whittle; M Feyder; W D'Hanis; D Yilmazer-Hanke; N Singewald; A Holmes
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 3.449

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.