Literature DB >> 16812069

Matching, contrast, and equalizing in the concurrent lever-press responding of rats.

W D Norman, F K McSweeney.   

Abstract

Five rats pressed levers for food reinforces delivered by several concurrent variable-interval variable-interval schedules. The rate of reinforcement available for responding on one component schedule was held constant at 60 reinforcers per hour. The rate of reinforcement available for responding on the other schedule varied from 30 to 240 reinforcers per hour. The behavior of the rats resembled the behavior of pigeons pecking keys for food reinforcers. The ratio of the overall rates of responding emitted under, and the ratio of the time spent responding under, the two components of each concurrent schedule were approximately equal to the ratio of the overall rates of reinforcement obtained from the components. The overall rate of responding emitted under, and the time spent responding under, the variable component schedule varied directly with the overall rate of reinforcement from that schedule. The overall rate of responding emitted under, and the time spent responding under, the constant component schedule varied inversely with the overall rate of reinforcement obtained from the variable component. The local rates of responding emitted under, and the local rates of reinforcement obtained from, the two components did not differ consistently across subjects. But they were not exactly equal either.

Entities:  

Year:  1978        PMID: 16812069      PMCID: PMC1332843          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1978.29-453

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  9 in total

1.  Concurrent performances: reinforcement interaction and response independence.

Authors:  A C CATANIA
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Choice as time allocation.

Authors:  W M Baum; H C Rachlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  A yoked-chamber comparison of concurrent and multiple schedules.

Authors:  P Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Matching and contrast on several concurrent treadle-press schedules.

Authors:  F K McSweeney
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Time-based and count-based measurement of preference.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  A quantitative analysis of the responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  A C Catania; G S Reynolds
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Changeover delay and concurrent schedules: some effects on relative performance measures.

Authors:  R L Shull; S S Pliskoff
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 2.468

  9 in total
  8 in total

1.  The general matching law describes choice on concurrent variable-interval schedules of wheel-running reinforcement.

Authors:  T W Belke; J Belliveau
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Sensitivity to reinforcement in concurrent arithmetic and exponential schedules.

Authors:  R Taylor; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Reinforcement and punishment effects in concurrent schedules: A test of two models.

Authors:  J Farley
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Local rates of responding and reinforcement during concurrent schedules.

Authors:  F K McSweeney; C L Melville; M A Buck; J E Whipple
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Concurrent variable-ratio schedules: Implications for the generalized matching law.

Authors:  J S Macdonall
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Variable-interval schedules of timeout from avoidance.

Authors:  M Perone; M Galizio
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Choice, experience, and the generalized matching law.

Authors:  J C Todorov; J M de Oliveira Castro; E S Hanna; M C Bittencourt de Sa; M Q Barreto
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Matching since Baum (1979).

Authors:  J H Wearden; I S Burgess
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 2.468

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.