Literature DB >> 16812264

Independence of response force and reinforcement rate on concurrent variable-interval schedule performance.

I Hunter, M Davison.   

Abstract

Five pigeons were trained over 43 experimental conditions on a variety of concurrent variable-interval schedules on which the forces required on the response keys were varied. The results were well described by the generalized matching law with log reinforcement ratios and log force ratios exerting independent (noninteractive) effects on preference. A further analysis using the Akaike criterion, an information-theoretic measure of the efficiency of a model, showed that overall reinforcement rate and overall force requirement did not affect preference. Unlike reinforcement rate changes, force requirement increases did not change the response rate on the alternate key, and an extension of Herrnstein's absolute response rate function for force variation on a single variable-interval schedule is suggested.

Year:  1982        PMID: 16812264      PMCID: PMC1333133          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1982.37-183

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  16 in total

1.  EFFECTS OF EFFORT ON RESPONSE RATE.

Authors:  S H CHUNG
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1965-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Choice as time allocation.

Authors:  W M Baum; H C Rachlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Interaction of frequency and magnitude of reinforcement on concurrent performances.

Authors:  J C Todorov
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Concurrent responding with fixed relative rate of reinforcement.

Authors:  D A Stubbs; S S Pliskoff
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Reinforcer effectiveness as a function of reinforcer rate and magnitude: a comparison of concurrent performances.

Authors:  J W Schneider
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Matching and contrast on several concurrent treadle-press schedules.

Authors:  F K McSweeney
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Matching, undermatching, and overmatching in studies of choice.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  16 in total

1.  Effects of reinforcer rate and reinforcer quality on time allocation: Extensions of matching theory to educational settings.

Authors:  N A Neef
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1992

2.  Bias and sensitivity to reinforcement in a concurrent-chain schedule.

Authors:  M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Concurrent schedules: Quantifying the aversiveness of noise.

Authors:  T M McAdie; T M Foster; W Temple
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Choice and terminal-link response topography.

Authors:  S Starin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Assessing preference for reinforcers using demand curves, work-rate functions, and expansion paths.

Authors:  R D Tustin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Concurrent schedules: Interaction of reinforcer frequency and reinforcer duration.

Authors:  M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Sensitivity of time allocation to an overall reinforcer rate feedback function in concurrent interval schedules.

Authors:  M Davison; A Kerr
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Concurrent variable-interval schedule performance: Fixed versus mixed reinforcer durations.

Authors:  M Davison; I Hogsden
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Concurrent schedules: Effects of time- and response-allocation constraints.

Authors:  M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Choice in a self-control paradigm: Quantification of experience-based differences.

Authors:  A W Logue; M L Rodriguez; T E Peña-Correal; B C Mauro
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.