Literature DB >> 16812102

Matching with a key-peck response in concurrent negative reinforcement schedules.

L Hutton, E T Gardner, P Lewis.   

Abstract

In the absence of responding, pigeons were shocked under a variable-time schedule. Responses on either of two keys occasionally produced one minute of shock-free time. That is, pigeons' key pecks were reinforced with shock-free time under concurrent variable-interval schedules. The relative frequency of access to the one-minute shock-free periods was systematically manipulated. Pigeons tended to match both relative response rate and proportion of time spent on each key to the relative frequency of the shock-free periods. A best-fit linear regression equation accounted for over 95% of the variance in both relative response rate and time allocation. The data paralleled closely the results of concurrent schedules of positive reinforcement. These findings are consistent with a description of reinforcement as a transition to a higher-valued situation and suggest that common laws govern choice for both positive and negative reinforcement.

Year:  1978        PMID: 16812102      PMCID: PMC1332719          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1978.30-225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  7 in total

1.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Undermatching: a reappraisal of performance on concurrent variable-interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  D L Myers; L E Myers
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Performance in concurrent interval schedules: a systematic replication.

Authors:  B Lobb; M C Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  The law of effect and avoidance: a quantitative relationship between response rate and shock-frequency reduction.

Authors:  P A De Villiers
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Negatively reinforced key pecking.

Authors:  P Lewis; L Lewin; M Stoyak; P Muehleisen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  The correlation-based law of effect.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 2.468

  7 in total
  6 in total

1.  The general matching law describes choice on concurrent variable-interval schedules of wheel-running reinforcement.

Authors:  T W Belke; J Belliveau
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Concurrent avoidance of shocks by pigeons pecking a key.

Authors:  E A De Moraes Ferrari; J C Todorov
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Concurrent schedules of positive and negative reinforcement: differential-impact and differential-outcomes hypotheses.

Authors:  Michael A Magoon; Thomas S Critchfield
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Choice, experience, and the generalized matching law.

Authors:  J C Todorov; J M de Oliveira Castro; E S Hanna; M C Bittencourt de Sa; M Q Barreto
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Choice in quail neonates: the origins of generalized matching.

Authors:  Susan M Schneider; Robert Lickliter
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Matching since Baum (1979).

Authors:  J H Wearden; I S Burgess
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 2.468

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.