Literature DB >> 13981054

A further study of stimulus generalization following three-stimulus discrimination training.

D R THOMAS, J L WILLIAMS.   

Abstract

A group of pigeons was trained in a Skinner box to peck for VI reinforcement when the key was illuminated by a monochromatic light of 540 or 580 mmu but were non-reinforced for responding to 560 mmu. Two control groups, differing in amount of training, received only the two positive stimuli. At the completion of training all Ss received generalization tests under extinction. Both control groups produced bi-modal generalization gradients with the peaks of responding at the S+ values. The post-discrimination gradient revealed peaks displaced from the S+ values in the direction away from the S-, low responding and increased steepness in the region of S- and a general elevation of the gradient.

Keywords:  DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; GENERALIZATION LEARNING

Mesh:

Year:  1963        PMID: 13981054      PMCID: PMC1404276          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  9 in total

1.  The effects of drive and discrimination training on stimulus generalization.

Authors:  D R THOMAS
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1962-07

2.  The effects of delayed testing on generalization slope.

Authors:  D R THOMAS; L J LOPEZ
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1962-08

3.  Generalization gradients around stimuli associated with different reinforcement schedules.

Authors:  N GUTTMAN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-11

4.  Effects of discrimination training on stimulus generalization.

Authors:  H M HANSON
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-11

5.  Stimulus generalization following three-stimulus discrimination training.

Authors:  H M HANSON
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1961-04

6.  Behavioral contrast.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Differential effects of continuous extinction and discrimination training on the generalization gradient.

Authors:  W K HONIG; D R THOMAS; N GUTTM AN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-08

8.  Stimulus Generalization as a Function of the Time between Training and Testing Procedures.

Authors:  D R Thomas; J Ost; D Thomas
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1960-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Contrast, generalization, and the process of discrimination.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-10       Impact factor: 2.468

  9 in total
  7 in total

1.  GENERALIZATION GRADIENTS FOLLOWING TWO-RESPONSE DISCRIMINATION TRAINING.

Authors:  T RISLEY
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  STIMULUS GENERALIZATION ALONG A LIGHT FLICKER RATE CONTINUUM AFTER DISCRIMINATION TRAINING WITH SEVERAL S-'S.

Authors:  H N SLOANE
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Discriminated response and incentive processes in operant conditioning: a two-factor model of stimulus control.

Authors:  S J Weiss
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Some determinants of inhibitory stimulus control.

Authors:  R G Weisman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Stimulus generalization and delay of reinforcement during one component of a multiple schedule.

Authors:  R W Richards
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Discriminative effects of massed extincttion.

Authors:  M Yarczower
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Temporal Generalization of Synchronized Saccades Beyond the Trained Range in Monkeys.

Authors:  Ryuji Takeya; Aniruddh D Patel; Masaki Tanaka
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-11-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.