Literature DB >> 16811904

Stimulus duration as a measure of stimulus generalization.

W K Honig, I L Beale.   

Abstract

Four pigeons in the line-positive group were trained with a vertical line on a green background that signalled intermittent reinforcement while a plain green field signalled extinction. Four pigeons in the line-negative group were trained with the opposite discrimination. Response to a control key terminated any trial and initiated the next trial. The birds also used the control key during generalization tests to control the durations of trials in which various line orientations were presented. These durations were summed to provide generalization gradients of stimulus duration that were positive or negative in accordance with the trained discriminations. In Experiment 2, birds from the line-positive group were tested with a procedure in which the control key was not available on some trials. This provided an independent assessment of response rates to the test stimuli. These rates were used to predict the stimulus durations obtained when the control key was available. The findings supported a general model for the prediction of response distributions among concurrent stimuli from rates observed with single stimuli.

Year:  1976        PMID: 16811904      PMCID: PMC1333452          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1976.25-209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  11 in total

1.  Generalization gradients of inhibition following auditory discrimination learning.

Authors:  H M JENKINS; R H HARRISON
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  An experimental outline for building and exploring multi-operant behavior repertoires.

Authors:  J D FINDLEY
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Prediction of preference, transposition, and transposition-reversal from the generalization gradient.

Authors:  W K HONIG
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1962-09

4.  Choice as time allocation.

Authors:  W M Baum; H C Rachlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Peak shift in concurrent schedules.

Authors:  A S Winton; I L Beale
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Some determinants of inhibitory stimulus control.

Authors:  R G Weisman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Preference and Switching under Concurrent Scheduling.

Authors:  J D Findley
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1958-04       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Inhibitory stimulus control in concurrent schedules.

Authors:  I L Beale; A S Winton
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Maintenance of behavior controlling the duration of discriminative stimuli.

Authors:  C M Leyland; W K Honig
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Discrimination learning and inhibition.

Authors:  H S Terrace
Journal:  Science       Date:  1966-12-30       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  2 in total

1.  The legacy of Guttman and Kalish (1956): Twenty-five years of research on stimulus generalization.

Authors:  W K Honig; P J Urcuioli
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Choice, time allocation, and response rate during stimulus generalization.

Authors:  C Mandell; J A Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 2.468

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.