Literature DB >> 16811321

Generalization gradients of inhibition after different amounts of training.

G W Farthing, E Hearst.   

Abstract

Five groups of pigeons received seven sessions of variable-interval reinforcement for pecking a blank white key, followed by either 1, 2, 4, 8, or 16 sessions of training on a successive discrimination in which the positive stimulus was the blank white key and the negative stimulus was a black vertical line on the white key. After training, a generalization test was administered along the line-tilt continuum. Relative gradients of inhibition became steeper with increased amounts of training, and reliably nonhorizontal absolute gradients were obtained only from groups of subjects with at least four days of training. Therefore, inhibitory stimulus control improves with added training. Several problems with the concept of "inhibition" are examined and some implications of the results for theoretical analyses of operant discrimination learning are discussed.

Year:  1968        PMID: 16811321      PMCID: PMC1338627          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-743

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  11 in total

Review 1.  SELECTIVE ATTENTION IN ANIMAL DISCRIMINATION LEARNING.

Authors:  N J MACKINTOSH
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1965-08       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Generalization gradients of inhibition following auditory discrimination learning.

Authors:  H M JENKINS; R H HARRISON
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Effect of discrimination training on auditory generalization.

Authors:  H M JENKINS; R H HARRISON
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1960-04

4.  Discriminability and stimulus generalization.

Authors:  N GUTTMAN; H I KALISH
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1956-01

5.  Contrast, generalization, and the process of discrimination.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-10       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 6.  Pavlovian conditioning and its proper control procedures.

Authors:  R A Rescorla
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Stimulus generalization and amount of prior training on variable-interval reinforcement.

Authors:  E Hearst; M B Koresko
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1968-08

8.  Behavioral contrast and the peak shift: effects of extended discrimination training.

Authors:  H S Terrace
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-11       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Conditioned inhibition and excitation in operant discrimination learning.

Authors:  P L Brown; H M Jenkins
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1967-10

10.  Discrimination learning and inhibition.

Authors:  H S Terrace
Journal:  Science       Date:  1966-12-30       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  14 in total

1.  The abative effect: A new term to describe the action of antecedents that reduce operant responding.

Authors:  Sean Laraway; Susan Snycerski; Jack Michael; Alan Poling
Journal:  Anal Verbal Behav       Date:  2002

2.  Stimulus control: part I.

Authors:  J A Dinsmoor
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1995

3.  Behavioral contrast and inhibitory stimulus control as related to extended training.

Authors:  W Selekman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Inhibitory stimulus control following errorless discrimination learning.

Authors:  M Rilling; H J Caplan; R C Howard; C H Brown
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Stimulus generalization and delay of reinforcement during one component of a multiple schedule.

Authors:  R W Richards
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Contrast and stimulus generalization following prolonged discrimination training.

Authors:  E Hearst
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Generalization of excitation and inhibition after different amounts of training of an avoidance baseline.

Authors:  M Rilling; J E Budnik
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  The effect of discrimination training on responses to a new stimulus.

Authors:  K Anger; D Anger
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-11       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Inhibitory stimulus control and the magnitude of delayed reinforcement.

Authors:  R W Richards
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Inhibition and the stimulus control of operant behavior.

Authors:  E Hearst; S Besley; G W Farthing
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-11       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.