Literature DB >> 16811867

Inhibitory stimulus control following errorless discrimination learning.

M Rilling, H J Caplan, R C Howard, C H Brown.   

Abstract

Three generalization procedures were used to investigate inhibitory stimulus control following discrimination learning with few errors. Three groups of pigeons acquired a discrimination between a green stimulus (the positive stimulus) and a vertical or horizontal line (the negative stimulus) through differential autoshaping followed by multiple schedule presentation of the two stimuli with gradually increasing stimulus durations. Genereralization testing was along a line-tilt continuum. For one group, the test involved a resistance-to-reinforcement procedure in which responses to all line tilts were reinforced on a variable-interval schedule. For a second group, also tested with the resistance-to-reinforcement procedure, the lines were superimposed on the green field that formerly served as the positive stimulus. A third group was tested in extinction with the combined stimuli. Control groups had no discrimination training but responding to green was nondifferentially reinforced. The control subjects responded more to all line tilts during testing than did the comparable experimental subjects, indicating that the negative stimulus had become an inhibitory stimulus. Both resistance-to-reinforcement groups revealed inhibitory gradients around the negative stimulus, but the gradient for the extinction group was relatively flat. These data are consistent with others that modify Terrace's early conclusion concerning the failure of inhibition to develop during errorless training.

Entities:  

Year:  1975        PMID: 16811867      PMCID: PMC1333392          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1975.24-121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  8 in total

1.  Testing for inhibitory stimulus control with S- superimposed on S+.

Authors:  J M Davis
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Generalization gradients of inhibition after different amounts of training.

Authors:  G W Farthing; E Hearst
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Errorless discrimination established by differential autoshaping.

Authors:  D M Wilkie; D G Ramer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Inhibition and the stimulus control of operant behavior.

Authors:  E Hearst; S Besley; G W Farthing
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Errorless discrimination, autoshaping, and conditioned inhibition.

Authors:  M G Wessells
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-11-30       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Stimulus generalization as a function of discrimination learning with and without errors.

Authors:  J Lyons
Journal:  Science       Date:  1969-01-31       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Discrimination learning and inhibition.

Authors:  J A Deutsch; H S Terrace
Journal:  Science       Date:  1967-05-19       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Discrimination learning and inhibition.

Authors:  H S Terrace
Journal:  Science       Date:  1966-12-30       Impact factor: 47.728

  8 in total
  3 in total

1.  The legacy of Guttman and Kalish (1956): Twenty-five years of research on stimulus generalization.

Authors:  W K Honig; P J Urcuioli
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 2.  The role of observing and attention in establishing stimulus control.

Authors:  J A Dinsmoor
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Brightness contrast: a reinterpretation of compound cue and combined cue experiments with pigeons.

Authors:  H C Santiago; A A Wright
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 2.468

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.