Literature DB >> 16808770

Disclosure of medical errors: what factors influence how patients respond?

Kathleen M Mazor1, George W Reed, Robert A Yood, Melissa A Fischer, Joann Baril, Jerry H Gurwitz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Disclosure of medical errors is encouraged, but research on how patients respond to specific practices is limited.
OBJECTIVE: This study sought to determine whether full disclosure, an existing positive physician-patient relationship, an offer to waive associated costs, and the severity of the clinical outcome influenced patients' responses to medical errors. PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred and seven health plan members participated in a randomized experiment in which they viewed video depictions of medical error and disclosure.
DESIGN: Subjects were randomly assigned to experimental condition. Conditions varied in type of medication error, level of disclosure, reference to a prior positive physician-patient relationship, an offer to waive costs, and clinical outcome. MEASURES: Self-reported likelihood of changing physicians and of seeking legal advice; satisfaction, trust, and emotional response.
RESULTS: Nondisclosure increased the likelihood of changing physicians, and reduced satisfaction and trust in both error conditions. Nondisclosure increased the likelihood of seeking legal advice and was associated with a more negative emotional response in the missed allergy error condition, but did not have a statistically significant impact on seeking legal advice or emotional response in the monitoring error condition. Neither the existence of a positive relationship nor an offer to waive costs had a statistically significant impact.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence that full disclosure is likely to have a positive effect or no effect on how patients respond to medical errors. The clinical outcome also influences patients' responses. The impact of an existing positive physician-patient relationship, or of waiving costs associated with the error remains uncertain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16808770      PMCID: PMC1924693          DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00465.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  33 in total

Review 1.  Morally managing medical mistakes.

Authors:  M L Smith; H P Forster
Journal:  Camb Q Healthc Ethics       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 2.  Disclosure and prevention of medical errors. Committee on Bioethical Issues of the Medical Society of the State of New York.

Authors:  F Rosner; J T Berger; P Kark; J Potash; A J Bennett
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2000-07-24

3.  Medical malpractice, mistake prevention, and compensation.

Authors:  T May; M P Aulisio
Journal:  Kennedy Inst Ethics J       Date:  2001-06

4.  Physician-patient communication. The relationship with malpractice claims among primary care physicians and surgeons.

Authors:  W Levinson; D L Roter; J P Mullooly; V T Dull; R M Frankel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-02-19       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Errors in medicine: nurturing truthfulness.

Authors:  F Baylis
Journal:  J Clin Ethics       Date:  1997

6.  Legal anxieties and medical mistakes: barriers and pretexts.

Authors:  M B Kapp
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 7.  Bioethics for clinicians: 23. Disclosure of medical error.

Authors:  P C Hébert; A V Levin; G Robertson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-02-20       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 8.  Risk management: extreme honesty may be the best policy.

Authors:  S S Kraman; G Hamm
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1999-12-21       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  When a physician harms a patient by a medical error: ethical, legal, and risk-management considerations.

Authors:  D Finkelstein; A W Wu; N A Holtzman; M K Smith
Journal:  J Clin Ethics       Date:  1997

10.  How do patients want physicians to handle mistakes? A survey of internal medicine patients in an academic setting.

Authors:  A B Witman; D M Park; S B Hardin
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1996 Dec 9-23
View more
  23 in total

1.  Lies in the doctor-patient relationship.

Authors:  John J Palmieri; Theodore A Stern
Journal:  Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2009

2.  Improving Communication and Resolution Following Adverse Events Using a Patient-Created Simulation Exercise.

Authors:  Thomas H Gallagher; Jason M Etchegaray; Brandelyn Bergstedt; Amelia M Chappelle; Madelene J Ottosen; Emily W Sedlock; Eric J Thomas
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  More than words: patients' views on apology and disclosure when things go wrong in cancer care.

Authors:  Kathleen M Mazor; Sarah M Greene; Douglas Roblin; Celeste A Lemay; Cassandra L Firneno; Josephine Calvi; Carolyn D Prouty; Kathryn Horner; Thomas H Gallagher
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2011-08-06

4.  Ophthalmic malpractice and physician gender: a claims data analysis (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).

Authors:  Tamara R Fountain
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2014

5.  Disclosing medical errors to patients: attitudes and practices of physicians and trainees.

Authors:  Lauris C Kaldjian; Elizabeth W Jones; Barry J Wu; Valerie L Forman-Hoffman; Benjamin H Levi; Gary E Rosenthal
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Ethical problems in radiology: medical error and disclosure.

Authors:  N Magnavita; G Magnavita; A Fileni; A Bergamaschi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 3.469

7.  Disclosing medical errors to patients: it's not what you say, it's what they hear.

Authors:  Albert W Wu; I-Chan Huang; Samantha Stokes; Peter J Pronovost
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-07-04       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Using vignettes to explore judgements of patients about safety and quality of care: the role of outcome and relationship with the care provider.

Authors:  Rebecca Lawton; Peter Gardner; Rachel Plachcinski
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Apologies and medical error.

Authors:  Jennifer K Robbennolt
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Patient reactions to personalized medicine vignettes: an experimental design.

Authors:  Morgan Butrick; Debra Roter; Kimberly Kaphingst; Lori H Erby; Carlton Haywood; Mary Catherine Beach; Howard P Levy
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 8.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.