Literature DB >> 8951299

How do patients want physicians to handle mistakes? A survey of internal medicine patients in an academic setting.

A B Witman1, D M Park, S B Hardin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mistakes are an inevitable part of the practice of medicine. While the frequency and severity of medical errors are documented, little is known about patients' attitudes toward physician mistakes.
OBJECTIVE: To examine patient attitudes about physician errors.
DESIGN: A survey instrument assessed attitudes to 3 levels of physician mistakes (minor, moderate, and severe) and 2 fundamental physician responses: disclosure or nondisclosure. One hundred forty-nine study subjects were randomly selected from an academic general internal medicine outpatient clinic.
RESULTS: Virtually all patients (98%) desired some acknowledgment of even minor errors. Patient's desire for referral to another physician ranged from 14% following a minor mistake to 65% following a severe mistake. For both moderate and severe mistakes, patients were significantly more likely to consider litigation if the physician did not disclose the error. In the moderate mistake scenario, 12% of patients would sue if informed by the physician vs 20% if the physician failed to disclose the error and they discovered it by some other means (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients desire an acknowledgment from their physicians of even minor errors, and doing so may actually reduce the risk of punitive actions. These findings reinforce the importance of open communication between patients and physicians.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8951299

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  41 in total

1.  An ethical dilemma: Medical errors and medical culture.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-05-19

2.  Concealing accidental nursing home deaths.

Authors:  Steven H Miles
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2002-09

3.  Communication gaffes: a root cause of malpractice claims.

Authors:  Beth Huntington; Nettie Kuhn
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2003-04

4.  Accountability sought by patients following adverse events from medical care: the New Zealand experience.

Authors:  Marie Bismark; Edward Dauer; Ron Paterson; David Studdert
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  Risks and medico-legal aspects of endoscopic sinus surgery: a review.

Authors:  M Re; G Magliulo; R Romeo; F M Gioacchini; E Pasquini
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Ethics training needs to emphasize disclosure and apology.

Authors:  Doug Wojcieszak; James W Saxton; Maggie M Finkelstein
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2008-09

7.  Proportionality and the view from below: analysis of error disclosure.

Authors:  Linda S Scheirton
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2008-09

8.  Lies in the doctor-patient relationship.

Authors:  John J Palmieri; Theodore A Stern
Journal:  Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2009

9.  Characteristics of Medical Liability Claims Against Dermatologists From 1991 Through 2015.

Authors:  Heather Kornmehl; Sanminder Singh; Brandon L Adler; Alexander E Wolf; Dean A Bochner; April W Armstrong
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 10.282

10.  Patient assessments of a hypothetical medical error: effects of health outcome, disclosure, and staff responsiveness.

Authors:  A Cleopas; A Villaveces; A Charvet; P A Bovier; V Kolly; T V Perneger
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2006-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.