Literature DB >> 21029278

Using vignettes to explore judgements of patients about safety and quality of care: the role of outcome and relationship with the care provider.

Rebecca Lawton1, Peter Gardner, Rachel Plachcinski.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND There is a growing body of evidence that safe outcomes and quality care are important to patients. For the patient, evaluations of safety and quality are made on the basis of the interpersonal interactions that they have with health professionals as well as the technical aspects of their care. OBJECTIVE In this study, we investigated the extent to which outcome of care (harm or not) and relationship (good or bad) with the care provider impact on the judgements of responsibility and blame as well as decisions about likelihood of making a complaint. METHOD Ninety-eight mothers made seven ratings of responsibility, blame and action in response to four hypothetical vignettes in a questionnaire. The vignettes described poor quality ante-natal care in which outcome and relationship with the health-care provider were systematically manipulated across different versions of the questionnaire. RESULTS Multivariate analyses showed that participants made significantly more negative ratings in response to vignettes describing a bad outcome and those that described a poor relationship with the health professional. However, whilst ratings of seriousness and likelihood of making a complaint were most influenced by the manipulation of outcome in the vignettes, judgements of blame and responsibility were most effected by the depiction of relationship with the health professional as good or bad. Moreover, for three of the four vignettes, relationship rather than outcome most strongly influenced overall ratings of care. DISCUSSION These findings are discussed in the context of theory and policy developments.
© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21029278      PMCID: PMC5060577          DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00622.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


  28 in total

1.  The automated will: nonconscious activation and pursuit of behavioral goals.

Authors:  J A Bargh; P M Gollwitzer; A Lee-Chai; K Barndollar; R Trötschel
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2001-12

2.  Client satisfaction with reproductive health-care quality: integrating business approaches to modeling and measurement.

Authors:  Dana L Alden; Mai Hoa Do; Dharm Bhawuk
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Hurtful comments are harmful comments: respectful communication is not just an optional extra in healthcare.

Authors:  Vikki A Entwistle
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Physician-patient communication. The relationship with malpractice claims among primary care physicians and surgeons.

Authors:  W Levinson; D L Roter; J P Mullooly; V T Dull; R M Frankel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-02-19       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Nurses' responses to severity dependent errors: a study of the causal attributions made by nurses following an error.

Authors:  C E Meurier; C A Vincent; D G Parmar
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.187

6.  Assignment of responsibility for an accident.

Authors:  E Walster
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1966-01

7.  An analysis of the causes of adverse events from the Quality in Australian Health Care Study.

Authors:  R M Wilson; B T Harrison; R W Gibberd; J D Hamilton
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1999-05-03       Impact factor: 7.738

8.  Patient reports of preventable problems and harms in primary health care.

Authors:  Anton J Kuzel; Steven H Woolf; Valerie J Gilchrist; John D Engel; Thomas A LaVeist; Charles Vincent; Richard M Frankel
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

9.  Relation of patients' experiences with individual physicians to malpractice risk.

Authors:  Hector P Rodriguez; Angie Mae C Rodday; Richard E Marshall; Kimberly L Nelson; William H Rogers; Dana G Safran
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2007-11-30       Impact factor: 2.038

Review 10.  Psychosocial aspects of genetic screening of pregnant women and newborns: a systematic review.

Authors:  J M Green; J Hewison; H L Bekker; L D Bryant; H S Cuckle
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.014

View more
  2 in total

1.  Patient involvement in research.

Authors:  Professor Jonathan Tritter
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  A Social Network Approach to the Estimation of Perceived Quality of Health Care.

Authors:  Giulia Carletti; Nicola Soriani; Martina Mattiazzi; Dario Gregori
Journal:  Open Nurs J       Date:  2017-10-31
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.