BACKGROUND: A potentially fruitful strategy for increasing enrollment of minority patients in research is to engage minority clinicians. However, little attention has been paid to unique challenges and effective strategies for engaging practices with minority physicians. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to provide a model for recruiting community-based primary care practices with minority physicians into research studies. RESEARCH DESIGN: Practices were recruited using a 3-step process that included telephone contact, on-site meetings, and follow-up discussions. Strategies used to recruit 18 New Jersey community-based primary care practices with minority physicians for a quality improvement intervention study were assessed. RESULTS: Twelve of 18 practices (67%) were successfully recruited into the study. Effective recruitment strategies included building rapport using a multiethnic/multidisciplinary team led by a minority physician recruiter and stressing study benefits for the practice. We attempted to match recruiters and key practice members by race, underrepresented minority status of the lead recruiter, gender, career stage, experience in urban practice, and experience in clinical instruction. Practices that were successfully recruited had more characteristics in common between recruiters and key practice members than unsuccessfully recruited practices (mean number of characteristic matches = 3.75 vs. 1.83, P = 0.020). Study benefits cited by participants as motivators for participation included a general desire to provide good patient care by understanding their practices' strengths and challenges (92%) and improving their practice (85%). CONCLUSIONS: Our experience suggests that a staged, tailored, and iterative recruitment process emphasizing communication and relationship building can be successful in recruiting community-based primary care minority physicians into practice-based research.
BACKGROUND: A potentially fruitful strategy for increasing enrollment of minority patients in research is to engage minority clinicians. However, little attention has been paid to unique challenges and effective strategies for engaging practices with minority physicians. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to provide a model for recruiting community-based primary care practices with minority physicians into research studies. RESEARCH DESIGN: Practices were recruited using a 3-step process that included telephone contact, on-site meetings, and follow-up discussions. Strategies used to recruit 18 New Jersey community-based primary care practices with minority physicians for a quality improvement intervention study were assessed. RESULTS: Twelve of 18 practices (67%) were successfully recruited into the study. Effective recruitment strategies included building rapport using a multiethnic/multidisciplinary team led by a minority physician recruiter and stressing study benefits for the practice. We attempted to match recruiters and key practice members by race, underrepresented minority status of the lead recruiter, gender, career stage, experience in urban practice, and experience in clinical instruction. Practices that were successfully recruited had more characteristics in common between recruiters and key practice members than unsuccessfully recruited practices (mean number of characteristic matches = 3.75 vs. 1.83, P = 0.020). Study benefits cited by participants as motivators for participation included a general desire to provide good patient care by understanding their practices' strengths and challenges (92%) and improving their practice (85%). CONCLUSIONS: Our experience suggests that a staged, tailored, and iterative recruitment process emphasizing communication and relationship building can be successful in recruiting community-based primary care minority physicians into practice-based research.
Authors: Sandra E Brooks; Randy L Carter; Steven C Plaxe; Karen M Basen-Engquist; Michael Rodriguez; James Kauderer; Joan L Walker; Tashanna K N Myers; Janet G Drake; Laura J Havrilesky; Linda Van Le; Lisa M Landrum; Carol L Brown Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2015-04-30 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Shannon M Sweeney; Jennifer D Hall; Sarah S Ono; Leah Gordon; David Cameron; Jennifer Hemler; Leif I Solberg; Benjamin F Crabtree; Deborah J Cohen Journal: Am J Med Qual Date: 2017-09-04 Impact factor: 1.852
Authors: Sharon Johnston; Clare Liddy; William Hogg; Melissa Donskov; Grant Russell; Elizabeth Gyorfi-Dyke Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2010-12-13 Impact factor: 4.615
Authors: Shawna V Hudson; Pamela Ohman-Strickland; Jeanne M Ferrante; Grace Lu-Yao; A John Orzano; Benjamin F Crabtree Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2009 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Minal R Patel; Lara J Thomas; Kausar Hafeez; Matthew Shankin; Margaret Wilkin; Randall W Brown Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2014-06-16 Impact factor: 2.463