Literature DB >> 25937529

Patient and physician factors associated with participation in cervical and uterine cancer trials: an NRG/GOG247 study.

Sandra E Brooks1, Randy L Carter2, Steven C Plaxe3, Karen M Basen-Engquist4, Michael Rodriguez5, James Kauderer2, Joan L Walker6, Tashanna K N Myers7, Janet G Drake8, Laura J Havrilesky9, Linda Van Le10, Lisa M Landrum6, Carol L Brown11.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to identify patient and physician factors related to enrollment onto Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) trials.
METHODS: Prospective study of women with primary or recurrent cancer of the uterus or cervix treated at a GOG institution from July 2010 to January 2012. Logistic regression examined probability of availability, eligibility and enrollment in a GOG trial. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for significant (p<0.05) results reported.
RESULTS: Sixty institutions, 781 patients, and 150 physicians participated, 300/780 (38%) had a trial available, 290/300 had known participation status. Of these, 150 women enrolled (59.5%), 102 eligible did not enroll (35%), 38 (13%) were ineligible. Ethnicity and specialty of physician, practice type, data management availability, and patient age were significantly associated with trial availability. Patients with >4 comorbidities (OR 4.5; CI 1.7-11.8) had higher odds of trial ineligibility. Non-White patients (OR 7.9; CI 1.3-46.2) and patients of Black physicians had greater odds of enrolling (OR 56.5; CI 1.1-999.9) in a therapeutic trial. Significant patient therapeutic trial enrollment factors: belief trial may help (OR 76.9; CI 4.9->1000), concern about care if not on trial (OR12.1; CI 2.1-71.4), pressure to enroll (OR .27; CI 0.12-.64), caregiving without pay (OR 0.13; CI .02-.84). Significant physician beliefs were: patients would not do well on standard therapy (OR 3.6; CI 1.6-8.4), and trial would not be time consuming (OR 3.3; CI 1.3-8.1).
CONCLUSIONS: Trial availability, patient and physician beliefs were factors identified that if modified could improve enrollment in cancer cooperative group clinical trials.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical cancer trials; Clinical trial enrollment; Gynecologic Oncology Group; Minority enrollment; NRG Oncology; Patient and physician factors; Uterine cancer trials

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25937529      PMCID: PMC4489417          DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.04.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  28 in total

1.  Increasing participation of physicians and patients from underrepresented racial and ethnic groups in National Cancer Institute-sponsored clinical trials.

Authors:  Michaele C Christian; Edward L Trimble
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Predicting accrual achievement: monitoring accrual milestones of NCI-CTEP-sponsored clinical trials.

Authors:  Steven K Cheng; Mary S Dietrich; David M Dilts
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Increasing accrual in cancer clinical trials with a focus on minority enrollment: The William Beaumont Hospital Community Clinical Oncology Program Experience.

Authors:  Frank Vicini; Joyce Nancarrow-Tull; Chirag Shah; Gary Chmielewski; Monty Fakhouri; Stacey A Sitarek; Claire T Feczko; Carol Brzozowski; David L Felten
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Increasing minority patient participation in cancer clinical trials using oncology nurse navigation.

Authors:  Dennis Ricky Holmes; Jacquelyn Major; Doris Efosi Lyonga; Rebecca Simone Alleyne; Sheilah Marie Clayton
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Unequal burden of disease, unequal participation in clinical trials: solutions from African American and Latino community members.

Authors:  Marvella E Ford; Laura A Siminoff; Elisabeth Pickelsimer; Arch G Mainous; Daniel W Smith; Vanessa A Diaz; Lea H Soderstrom; Melanie S Jefferson; Barbara C Tilley
Journal:  Health Soc Work       Date:  2013-02

6.  Community needs, concerns, and perceptions about health research: findings from the clinical and translational science award sentinel network.

Authors:  Linda B Cottler; Donna Jo McCloskey; Sergio Aguilar-Gaxiola; Nancy M Bennett; Hal Strelnick; Molly Dwyer-White; Deborah E Collyar; Shaun Ajinkya; Sarena D Seifer; Catina Callahan O'Leary; Catherine W Striley; Bradley Evanoff
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Participation in cancer clinical trials: race-, sex-, and age-based disparities.

Authors:  Vivek H Murthy; Harlan M Krumholz; Cary P Gross
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-06-09       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Improving awareness of cancer clinical trials among Hispanic patients and families: audience segmentation decisions for a media intervention.

Authors:  Gwendolyn P Quinn; Jessica McIntyre; Luis E Gonzalez; Teresita Muñoz Antonia; Prado Antolino; Kristen J Wells
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2013-05-02

9.  Surveillance, epidemiology, and end results analysis of 2677 cases of uterine sarcoma 1989-1999.

Authors:  Sandra E Brooks; Min Zhan; Timothy Cote; Claudia R Baquet
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 10.  Recruitment of ethnic minorities into cancer clinical trials: experience from the front lines.

Authors:  R P Symonds; K Lord; A J Mitchell; D Raghavan
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  4 in total

1.  Increasing Minority Enrollment Onto Clinical Trials: Practical Strategies and Challenges Emerge From the NRG Oncology Accrual Workshop.

Authors:  Sandra E Brooks; Carolyn Y Muller; William Robinson; Eleanor M Walker; Kate Yeager; Elise D Cook; Sue Friedman; Carol P Somkin; Carol Leslie Brown; Worta McCaskill-Stevens
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  Is age a prognostic biomarker for survival among women with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with chemoradiation? An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group ancillary data analysis.

Authors:  Kathleen N Moore; James J Java; Katrina N Slaughter; Peter G Rose; Rachelle Lanciano; Paul A DiSilvestro; J Tate Thigpen; Yi-Chun Lee; Krishnansu S Tewari; Junzo Chino; Shelly M Seward; David S Miller; Ritu Salani; David H Moore; Frederick B Stehman
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Magnitude of Structural, Clinical, and Physician and Patient Barriers to Cancer Clinical Trial Participation.

Authors:  Joseph M Unger; Riha Vaidya; Dawn L Hershman; Lori M Minasian; Mark E Fleury
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  "When Offered to Participate": A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Patient Agreement to Participate in Cancer Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Joseph M Unger; Dawn L Hershman; Cathee Till; Lori M Minasian; Raymond U Osarogiagbon; Mark E Fleury; Riha Vaidya
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 13.506

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.