BACKGROUND: While some research has been conducted examining recruitment methods to engage physicians and practices in primary care research, further research is needed on recruitment methodology as it remains a recurrent challenge and plays a crucial role in primary care research. This paper reviews recruitment strategies, common challenges, and innovative practices from five recent primary care health services research studies in Ontario, Canada. METHODS: We used mixed qualitative and quantitative methods to gather data from investigators and/or project staff from five research teams. Team members were interviewed and asked to fill out a brief survey on recruitment methods, results, and challenges encountered during a recent or ongoing project involving primary care practices or physicians. Data analysis included qualitative analysis of interview notes and descriptive statistics generated for each study. RESULTS: Recruitment rates varied markedly across the projects despite similar initial strategies. Common challenges and creative solutions were reported by many of the research teams, including building a sampling frame, developing front-office rapport, adapting recruitment strategies, promoting buy-in and interest in the research question, and training a staff recruiter. CONCLUSIONS: Investigators must continue to find effective ways of reaching and involving diverse and representative samples of primary care providers and practices by building personal connections with, and buy-in from, potential participants. Flexible recruitment strategies and an understanding of the needs and interests of potential participants may also facilitate recruitment.
BACKGROUND: While some research has been conducted examining recruitment methods to engage physicians and practices in primary care research, further research is needed on recruitment methodology as it remains a recurrent challenge and plays a crucial role in primary care research. This paper reviews recruitment strategies, common challenges, and innovative practices from five recent primary care health services research studies in Ontario, Canada. METHODS: We used mixed qualitative and quantitative methods to gather data from investigators and/or project staff from five research teams. Team members were interviewed and asked to fill out a brief survey on recruitment methods, results, and challenges encountered during a recent or ongoing project involving primary care practices or physicians. Data analysis included qualitative analysis of interview notes and descriptive statistics generated for each study. RESULTS: Recruitment rates varied markedly across the projects despite similar initial strategies. Common challenges and creative solutions were reported by many of the research teams, including building a sampling frame, developing front-office rapport, adapting recruitment strategies, promoting buy-in and interest in the research question, and training a staff recruiter. CONCLUSIONS: Investigators must continue to find effective ways of reaching and involving diverse and representative samples of primary care providers and practices by building personal connections with, and buy-in from, potential participants. Flexible recruitment strategies and an understanding of the needs and interests of potential participants may also facilitate recruitment.
Authors: Deborah G Graham; Mindy S Spano; Tom V Stewart; Elizabeth W Staton; Angela Meers; Wilson D Pace Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2007 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Megan Carter; Tina Karwalajtys; Larry Chambers; Janusz Kaczorowski; Lisa Dolovich; Tracy Gierman; Dana Cross; Stephanie Laryea Journal: Health Promot Int Date: 2009-10-09 Impact factor: 2.483
Authors: A E Borgiel; E V Dunn; C T Lamont; P J MacDonald; M K Evensen; M J Bass; R A Spasoff; J I Williams Journal: Fam Pract Date: 1989-09 Impact factor: 2.267
Authors: Leeat Granek; Merav Ben-David; Ora Nakash; Michal Cohen; Lisa Barbera; Samuel Ariad; Monika K Krzyzanowska Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-01-13 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Shannon M Sweeney; Jennifer D Hall; Sarah S Ono; Leah Gordon; David Cameron; Jennifer Hemler; Leif I Solberg; Benjamin F Crabtree; Deborah J Cohen Journal: Am J Med Qual Date: 2017-09-04 Impact factor: 1.852
Authors: Jane McCusker; Martin Cole; Mark Yaffe; Tamara Sussman; Kim L Lavoie; Erin Strumpf; Maida Sewitch; Deniz Sahin; Manon de Raad Journal: Ment Health Fam Med Date: 2012-12
Authors: Matthew J Page; Simon D French; Joanne E McKenzie; Denise A O'Connor; Sally E Green Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2011-03-31 Impact factor: 4.615
Authors: Ellen Funkhouser; Deborah A Levine; Joe K Gerald; Thomas K Houston; Nancy K Johnson; Jeroan J Allison; Catarina I Kiefe Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2011-09-09 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Christine L Paul; Leon Piterman; Jonathan Shaw; Catherine Kirby; Robert W Sanson-Fisher; Mariko L Carey; Jennifer Robinson; Patrick McElduff; Isaraporn Thepwongsa Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2013-03-13 Impact factor: 7.327