Literature DB >> 16787695

Simple enucleation for the treatment of PT1a renal cell carcinoma: our 20-year experience.

Marco Carini1, Andrea Minervini, Lorenzo Masieri, Alberto Lapini, Sergio Serni.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of simple enucleation as a conservative treatment for pT1a RCC, and to report on the incidence of major complications, local recurrence, and progression-free and disease-specific survival rates.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of 232 patients who had nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) by simple enucleation between 1986 and 2004 for sporadic, unilateral, pathologically confirmed pT1a RCC. The patients' status was evaluated last in September 2005. The mean (median, range) follow-up was 76 (61, 12-225) months.
RESULTS: The mean (SD, median, range) tumor greatest dimension was 2.8 (0.78, 2.85, 0.6-4) cm. The histopathologic review according to the International Union Against Cancer and American Joint Commission for Cancer (1997) classification revealed 198 clear cell (85.3%), 18 papillary (7.8%), 15 chromophobe (6.5%) and one (0.4%) collecting duct RCCs. There were no major complications, such as prolonged acute tubular necrosis/chronic renal insufficiency and bleeding requiring open reoperation. One patient developed postoperative late retroperitoneal fluid collection consistent with urinoma, which required aspiration, drainage position and JJ stenting for 3 weeks. The 5- and 10-year cancer-specific survival were 96.7% and 94.7%, respectively. The 5- and 10-year progression-free survival were 96% and 94%, respectively. Overall, 13 (6.4%) patients had disease progression, three of whom had local recurrences alone (1.5%) elsewhere in the kidney; none had local recurrence at the level of the enucleation bed.
CONCLUSIONS: Simple tumor enucleation is a safe and acceptable nephron-sparing treatment that provides excellent long-term local control and cancer-specific survival rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16787695     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.05.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  25 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: technique and outcomes.

Authors:  Douglas S Berkman; Samir S Taneja
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Endoscopic robot-assisted simple enucleation (ERASE) for clinical T1 renal masses: description of the technique and early postoperative results.

Authors:  Andrea Minervini; Agostino Tuccio; Lorenzo Masieri; Domenico Veneziano; Gianni Vittori; Giampaolo Siena; Mauro Gacci; Graziano Vignolini; Andrea Mari; Arcangelo Sebastianelli; Matteo Salvi; Sergio Serni; Marco Carini
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Surgical Margins in Nephron-Sparing Surgery for Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Dean D Laganosky; Christopher P Filson; Viraj A Master
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Gross intraoperative evaluation (GIE): a reliable method for the evaluation of surgical margins at partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Hasan Yilmaz; Seyfettin Ciftci; Levend Ozkan; Ali Saribacak; Kursat Yildiz; Ozdal Dillioglugil
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-03-15

5.  Positive surgical margins are predictors of local recurrence in conservative kidney surgery for pT1 tumors.

Authors:  Patricio Garcia Marchiñena; Sebastián Tirapegui; Ignacio Tobia Gonzalez; Alberto Jurado; Guillermo Gueglio
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2018 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.541

Review 6.  [Current surgical aspects of renal cell carcinoma].

Authors:  Richard Zigeuner; Karl Pummer
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2009

7.  Tumor enucleation specimens of small renal tumors more frequently have a positive surgical margin than partial nephrectomy specimens, but this is not associated with local tumor recurrence.

Authors:  Lu Wang; Ian Hughes; Connor Snarskis; Helyn Alvarez; Jingyang Feng; Gopal N Gupta; Maria M Picken
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 4.064

8.  Differences in peritumoral pseudocapsule characteristics according to clinicopathological factors in clinical T1a renal tumors.

Authors:  Myong Kim; Woo Suk Choi; Chang Wook Jeong; Ja Hyeon Ku; Hyeon Hoe Kim; Kyung Chul Moon; Cheol Kwak
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-09-01

9.  Mini-Margin nephron sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma 4 cm or less.

Authors:  Quanlin Li; Hongwei Guan; Jie Qin; Tao Jiang
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2010-08-30

10.  Positive surgical margins at partial nephrectomy: predictors and oncological outcomes.

Authors:  Ofer Yossepowitch; R Houston Thompson; Bradley C Leibovich; Scott E Eggener; Joseph A Pettus; Eugene D Kwon; Harry W Herr; Michael L Blute; Paul Russo
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 7.450

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.