Literature DB >> 26617856

Differences in peritumoral pseudocapsule characteristics according to clinicopathological factors in clinical T1a renal tumors.

Myong Kim1, Woo Suk Choi2, Chang Wook Jeong2, Ja Hyeon Ku2, Hyeon Hoe Kim2, Kyung Chul Moon3, Cheol Kwak2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the status of peritumoral pseudocapsules in renal tumors and the effects of clinicopathological factors on their formation.
METHODS: From January 2011 to December 2012, 258 patients with solitary clinical stage T1a renal tumors who underwent partial nephrectomy were analyzed. Status of pseudocapsule was re-evaluated by a pathologist.
RESULTS: The mean long diameter (± SD) of the tumor and the width of the safety margin were 2.17 (± 0.94) cm and 3.2 (± 2.4) mm, respectively. A complete pseudocapsule was identified in 152 (58.9%) tumors, an incomplete pseudocapsule was identified in 69 (26.7%) tumors, and no pseudocapsule was identified in 37 (14.3%) tumors. Out of 152 tumors with complete pseudocapsules, 45 (29.6%) were confirmed to directly invade the renal parenchyma. In a multivariable analysis, age (odds ratio [OR], 1.045; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.021-1.070, P < 0.001) and histologic subtype (chromophobe type: OR, 19.455; 95% CI, 4.233-89.471, P < 0.001; oncocytoma: OR, 11.307; 95% CI, 1.357-94.198, P = 0.025) were significant factors for an incomplete or absent pseudocapsule.
CONCLUSIONS: Peritumoral pseudocapsules are absent or incomplete in a significant portion of renal tumors. Old age as well as chromophobe and oncocytoma histologic subtypes were significant risk factors for an incomplete or absent peritumoral pseudocapsule.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Renal tumor; partial nephrectomy; pathologic finding; peritumoral pseudocapsule; surgical margin

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26617856      PMCID: PMC4637672     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol        ISSN: 1936-2625


  25 in total

1.  [Magnetic resonance imaging findings of Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma].

Authors:  Xin-kun Wang; Hai-yi Wang; Jia Wang; Ying-wei Wang; Ye Wang; Ye-huan Tang; Hui-yi Ye
Journal:  Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2013-04-02

2.  Elective nephron sparing surgery should become standard treatment for small unilateral renal cell carcinoma: Long-term survival data of 216 patients.

Authors:  F Becker; S Siemer; U Humke; M Hack; M Ziegler; M Stöckle
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2005-12-09       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Small renal cell carcinoma: pathologic and radiologic correlation.

Authors:  Y Yamashita; M Takahashi; O Watanabe; S Yoshimatsu; S Ueno; S Ishimaru; M Kan; S Takano; N Ninomiya
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: 2014 update.

Authors:  Borje Ljungberg; Karim Bensalah; Steven Canfield; Saeed Dabestani; Fabian Hofmann; Milan Hora; Markus A Kuczyk; Thomas Lam; Lorenzo Marconi; Axel S Merseburger; Peter Mulders; Thomas Powles; Michael Staehler; Alessandro Volpe; Axel Bex
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Nephron-sparing surgery versus radical nephrectomy in the treatment of intracapsular renal cell carcinoma up to 7cm.

Authors:  Alessandro Antonelli; Alberto Cozzoli; Maria Nicolai; Danilo Zani; Tiziano Zanotelli; Laura Perucchini; Sergio Cosciani Cunico; Claudio Simeone
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Nephron sparing surgery for appropriately selected renal cell carcinoma between 4 and 7 cm results in outcome similar to radical nephrectomy.

Authors:  Bradley C Leibovich; Michael L Blute; John C Cheville; Christine M Lohse; Amy L Weaver; Horst Zincke
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  The feasibility of surgical enucleation for renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  F F Marshall; J B Taxy; E K Fishman; R Chang
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 8.  Partial nephrectomy: technique, complications and pathological findings.

Authors:  T J Polascik; C R Pound; M V Meng; A W Partin; F F Marshall
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  [Histological evaluation of enucleation for renal cell carcinoma using radical nephrectomy specimens].

Authors:  M Tochimoto; T Matsumoto
Journal:  Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi       Date:  1994-07

10.  Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  S A Fuhrman; L C Lasky; C Limas
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 6.394

View more
  4 in total

1.  [Small renal cell carcinoma-active surveillance and ablation].

Authors:  J J Wendler; R Damm; U-B Liehr; T Brunner; M Pech; M Schostak
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Comparison of renal functional outcomes of active surveillance and partial nephrectomy in the management of oncocytoma.

Authors:  Margaret F Meagher; Brian R Lane; Umberto Capitanio; Reza Mehrazin; Aaron W Bradshaw; Sabrina Noyes; Alessandro Larcher; Ahmed Eldefrawy; Fady Ghali; Devin Patel; Jacob Bruinius; Raksha Dutt; Cathrine Keiner; Nathan Miller; Fang Wan; Francesco Montorsi; Ithaar H Derweesh
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  A CT-Based Tumoral and Mini-Peritumoral Radiomics Approach: Differentiate Fat-Poor Angiomyolipoma from Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Yanqing Ma; Xiren Xu; Peipei Pang; Yang Wen
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 3.989

4.  No Detection of Pseudocapsule of Tumor-Parenchyma Interface on Multidetector Computed Tomography (MDCT) Images: Clinical Significance and Histological Reflections in Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Wei Xi; Qinxuan Tan; Yingyong Hou; Xiaoyi Hu; Hang Wang; Li Liu; Yu Xia; Qi Bai; Jiajun Wang; Jianjun Zhou; Jianming Guo
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 3.989

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.