Literature DB >> 16781187

High-specificity and high-sensitivity genotoxicity assessment in a human cell line: validation of the GreenScreen HC GADD45a-GFP genotoxicity assay.

Paul W Hastwell1, Li-Leng Chai, Kevin J Roberts, Thomas W Webster, James S Harvey, Robert W Rees, Richard M Walmsley.   

Abstract

The battery of genetic toxicity tests required by most regulatory authorities includes both bacterial and mammalian cell assays and identifies practically all genotoxic carcinogens. However, the relatively high specificity of the Salmonella mutagenicity assay (Ames test) is offset by the low specificity of the established mammalian cell assays, which leads to difficulties in the interpretation of the biological relevance of results. This paper describes a new high-throughput assay that links the regulation of the human GADD45a gene to the production of Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP). A study of 75 well-characterised genotoxic and non-genotoxic compounds with diverse mechanisms of DNA-damage induction (including aneugens) reveals that the assay responds positively to all classes of genotoxic damage with both high specificity and high sensitivity. The current micro-well assay format does not include metabolic activation, but a separate low-throughput protocol demonstrates a successful proof-of-principle for an S9 metabolic activation assay with the model pro-mutagen cyclophosphamide. The test should be of value both as a tool in the selection of candidate compounds for further development, where additional data may be required because of conflicting information from the in vitro test battery, or in product development areas where the use of animals is to be discontinued. As a microplate assay however, it has the qualities of high throughput and low compound use that will facilitate its application in early screening for genotoxic liability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16781187     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2006.04.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  27 in total

Review 1.  How accurate is in vitro prediction of carcinogenicity?

Authors:  Richard Maurice Walmsley; Nicholas Billinton
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 2.  Evaluation of in vitro assays for assessing the toxicity of cigarette smoke and smokeless tobacco.

Authors:  Michael D Johnson; Jodi Schilz; Mirjana V Djordjevic; Jerry R Rice; Peter G Shields
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Modern Approaches to Chemical Toxicity Screening.

Authors:  Eli G Hvastkovs; James F Rusling
Journal:  Curr Opin Electrochem       Date:  2017-04-03

4.  The Extended ToxTracker Assay Discriminates Between Induction of DNA Damage, Oxidative Stress, and Protein Misfolding.

Authors:  Giel Hendriks; Remco S Derr; Branislav Misovic; Bruno Morolli; Fabienne M G R Calléja; Harry Vrieling
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  Structure-based redesign of an edema toxin inhibitor.

Authors:  Deliang Chen; Lili Ma; John J Kanalas; Jian Gao; Jennifer Pawlik; Maria Estrella Jimenez; Mary A Walter; Johnny W Peterson; Scott R Gilbertson; Catherine H Schein
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 3.641

6.  Effect of training data size and noise level on support vector machines virtual screening of genotoxic compounds from large compound libraries.

Authors:  Pankaj Kumar; Xiaohua Ma; Xianghui Liu; Jia Jia; Han Bucong; Ying Xue; Ze Rong Li; Sheng Yong Yang; Yu Quan Wei; Yu Zong Chen
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 7.  Metabolic toxicity screening using electrochemiluminescence arrays coupled with enzyme-DNA biocolloid reactors and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Eli G Hvastkovs; John B Schenkman; James F Rusling
Journal:  Annu Rev Anal Chem (Palo Alto Calif)       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 10.745

8.  Synergistic metabolic toxicity screening using microsome/DNA electrochemiluminescent arrays and nanoreactors.

Authors:  Sadagopan Krishnan; Eli G Hvastkovs; Besnik Bajrami; Dharamainder Choudhary; John B Schenkman; James F Rusling
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 9.  Emerging metrology for high-throughput nanomaterial genotoxicology.

Authors:  Bryant C Nelson; Christa W Wright; Yuko Ibuki; Maria Moreno-Villanueva; Hanna L Karlsson; Giel Hendriks; Christopher M Sims; Neenu Singh; Shareen H Doak
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 3.000

10.  State-of-the-Art Metabolic Toxicity Screening and Pathway Evaluation.

Authors:  Eli G Hvastkovs; James F Rusling
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 6.986

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.