Literature DB >> 16778386

Retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for upper ureter stones.

Byong Chang Jeong1, Hyeung Keun Park, Seok Soo Byeon, Hyeon Hoe Kim.   

Abstract

We evaluated the role of retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy (RPLU) for upper ureter stones. Between February 1998 and July 2004, 12 patients (10 men and 2 women) underwent RPLU for upper ureter stones (mean size 18.1 mm, range 10-25). RPLU was carried out in 5 patients as a salvage treatment after failed shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) (3) and both of failed SWL and ureteroscopy (URS) (2), and in 7 patients as primary treatment for large impacted stones. Total 6 of 12 cases were converted to open surgery. The reason of open conversion was failure of locating ureter due to severe adhesion in 5 cases and vascular injury in 1 case. In 6 successful cases, mean operation time, mean estimated blood loss, and mean postoperative hospital stay were respectively 109 min (90-120 min), 50 mL (10-100 mL), 4.6 days (2-7 days). There was no serious postoperative complication except for one patient who showed delayed urinary leakage but was cured with conservative management. Our experience suggested that RPLU was not easy to perform simply because it was indicated mainly in ureter stones with severe adhesion or after failed SWL and/or URS. Nevertheless, it can be considered as a primary procedure before open ureterolithotomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16778386      PMCID: PMC2729948          DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2006.21.3.441

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Korean Med Sci        ISSN: 1011-8934            Impact factor:   2.153


  15 in total

1.  Laparoscopic operative retroperitoneoscopy: use of a new device.

Authors:  D D Gaur
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy.

Authors:  A Raboy; G S Ferzli; R Ioffreda; P S Albert
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Retroperitoneoscopy: experience with 200 cases.

Authors:  J J Rassweiler; O Seemann; T Frede; T O Henkel; P Alken
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  The role of open stone surgery since extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  D G Assimos; W H Boyce; L H Harrison; D L McCullough; R L Kroovand; K R Sweat
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy: the Edinburgh experience.

Authors:  F X Keeley; I Gialas; M Pillai; M Chrisofos; D A Tolley
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  Is the laparoscopic approach justified in patients with xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis?

Authors:  E Bercowsky; A L Shalhav; A Portis; A M Elbahnasy; E M McDougall; R V Clayman
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy: technical considerations and long-term follow-up.

Authors:  D D Gaur; S Trivedi; M R Prabhudesai; H R Madhusudhana; M Gopichand
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy: the results of an initial series, and an evaluation of its role in the management of ureteric calculi.

Authors:  L M Harewood; D R Webb; A J Pope
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1994-08

9.  Current indications for open stone surgery in an endourology center.

Authors:  C J Kane; D M Bolton; M L Stoller
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Current indications for open stone surgery in the treatment of renal and ureteral calculi.

Authors:  M L Paik; M A Wainstein; J P Spirnak; N Hampel; M I Resnick
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic urinary stone surgery: an updated evidence-based review.

Authors:  Andreas Skolarikos; Athanasios G Papatsoris; Stefanos Albanis; Dean Assimos
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-04-16

2.  Retroperitoneoscopic versus open mini-incision ureterolithotomy for upper- and mid-ureteric stones: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Jai Prakash; Vishwajeet Singh; Manoj Kumar; Manoj Kumar; Rahul Janak Sinha; Satyanarayan Sankhwar
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-11-23       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Minimally invasive surgical treatment for large impacted upper ureteral stones: Ureteroscopic lithotripsy or percutaneous nephrolithotomy?

Authors:  Ibrahim Halil Bozkurt; Tarik Yonguc; Burak Arslan; Tansu Degirmenci; Bulent Gunlusoy; Ozgu Aydogdu; Omer Koras
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy; which is better: Transperitoneal or retroperitoneal approach?

Authors:  Mostafa Khalil; Rabea Omar; Shabieb Abdel-Baky; Ahmed Mohey; Ahmed Sebaey
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2015-12

5.  Transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site ureterolithotomy for large impacted ureteral stones: initial experiences.

Authors:  Tae Heon Kim; Byong Chang Jeong; Seong Il Seo; Seong Soo Jeon; Deok Hyun Han
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-06-21

6.  Expectant Management of Ureter Stones: Outcome and Clinical Factors of Spontaneous Passage in a Single Institution's Experience.

Authors:  Dong-Un Tchey; Yun Sok Ha; Won Tae Kim; Seok Joong Yun; Sang Cheol Lee; Wun Jae Kim
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2011-12-20

7.  Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy vs Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy for Large Ureteral Stones.

Authors:  Jae Duck Choi; Seong Il Seo; Joonbeom Kwon; Bum Soo Kim
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2019 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.