Literature DB >> 10532968

Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy: the Edinburgh experience.

F X Keeley1, I Gialas, M Pillai, M Chrisofos, D A Tolley.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review our experience with laparoscopic ureterolithotomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Since 1993, we have performed laparoscopic ureterolithotomy in 14 patients with ureteric stones. Laparoscopy was carried out in nine patients as a salvage procedure after failed ureteroscopy (six), shock wave lithotripsy (two), or both (one), and in five patients as a primary procedure for large stones (mean 27.2 mm, range 18-40). Patients in the former group had already undergone a mean of 1.88 procedures (range 1-4). Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy was carried out via a transperitoneal approach. Associated ureteric strictures were incised at the time of ureterotomy.
RESULTS: All procedures were completed laparoscopically and all patients were rendered stone-free after a single procedure. The mean operative duration was 105 min. Ureteric strictures were incised in three patients, in two of whom dilatation was subsequently required; all three had a successful result. There were three minor complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy can be a safe and effective procedure; it should be considered as a primary procedure for large mid- and upper ureteric stones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10532968     DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.00287.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  13 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic urinary stone surgery: an updated evidence-based review.

Authors:  Andreas Skolarikos; Athanasios G Papatsoris; Stefanos Albanis; Dean Assimos
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-04-16

2.  Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy: minimally invasive second line treatment.

Authors:  Costantino Leonardo; Giuseppe Simone; Papalia Rocco; Salvatore Guaglianone; Giovanni Di Pierro; Michele Gallucci
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Retroperitoneoscopic versus open mini-incision ureterolithotomy for upper- and mid-ureteric stones: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Jai Prakash; Vishwajeet Singh; Manoj Kumar; Manoj Kumar; Rahul Janak Sinha; Satyanarayan Sankhwar
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-11-23       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 4.  [Importance of open and laparoscopic stone surgery].

Authors:  M Hruza; C Türk; T Frede; J Rassweiler
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Prospective Randomized Comparison of Open versus Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy: Experience of a Single Center from Northern India.

Authors:  Manish Garg; Vishwajeet Singh; Rahul J Sinha; Satya N Sankhwar; Manoj Kumar; Amit Kumar; Jai Prakash; Pradeep Kumar; Mohit Pandey
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2013-10-30

6.  Retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for upper ureter stones.

Authors:  Byong Chang Jeong; Hyeung Keun Park; Seok Soo Byeon; Hyeon Hoe Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.153

7.  Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy; which is better: Transperitoneal or retroperitoneal approach?

Authors:  Mostafa Khalil; Rabea Omar; Shabieb Abdel-Baky; Ahmed Mohey; Ahmed Sebaey
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2015-12

8.  Evaluation of role of retroperitoneoscopic pyelolithotomy and its comparison with percutaneous nephrolithotripsy.

Authors:  Apul Goel; A K Hemal
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.370

9.  Laparoscopy in the management of stone disease of urinary tract.

Authors:  Rajiv Yadav; Rajeev Kumar; Ashok K Hemal
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.407

10.  Ureteroscopic treatment of larger renal calculi (>2 cm).

Authors:  Demetrius H Bagley; Kelly A Healy; Nir Kleinmann
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2012-07-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.