Literature DB >> 2746742

The role of open stone surgery since extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

D G Assimos1, W H Boyce, L H Harrison, D L McCullough, R L Kroovand, K R Sweat.   

Abstract

Of 893 stone procedures 37 (4.1 per cent) performed during the first 19 months after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy was instituted at our medical center were open operations. Procedures included ureterolithotomy in 23 patients (with simultaneous pyelolithotomy in 1), anatrophic nephrolithotomy in 8, pyelolithotomy in 3 (with concomitant pyeloplasty in 2), partial nephrectomy in 2 and nephrolithotomy with a bowel segment inlay in 1. The most common reasons for electing an open operation were unsuccessful endoscopic stone manipulation, presence of anatomical obstruction in the intrarenal collecting system or ureter, morbid obesity and underlying medical problems precluding lengthy repeated endourological procedures. Over-all surgical results were excellent. Our study indicates that patients who presently require an open stone operation have complex calculous disease associated with a variety of anatomical and physiological problems. Despite this finding good results may be attained.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2746742     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38725-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  13 in total

1.  The comparison of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of solitary large renal pelvic stones.

Authors:  Ahmet Tefekli; Abdulkadir Tepeler; Tolga Akman; Muzaffer Akçay; Murat Baykal; Mert Ali Karadağ; Ahmet Y Muslumanoglu; Jean de la Rosette
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2012-02-04

Review 2.  Review on renal recovery after anatrophic nephrolithotomy: Are we really healing our patients?

Authors:  Leonardo de Albuquerque Dos Santos Abreu; Douglas Gregório Camilo-Silva; Gustavo Fiedler; Gustavo Barboza Corguinha; Matheus Miranda Paiva; João Antonio Pereira-Correia; Valter José Fernandes Muller
Journal:  World J Nephrol       Date:  2015-02-06

3.  Panlithiasis of the urinary tract: a case for open lithotomy in the modern era.

Authors:  Panagiotis Christopoulos; Goran Fryad; Andreas Bourdoumis; Georgios Papadopoulos; Stefanos Kachrilas; Junaid Masood; Noor Buchholz
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 4.  [Importance of open and laparoscopic stone surgery].

Authors:  M Hruza; C Türk; T Frede; J Rassweiler
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Changing patient and stone features for shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) in Turkey.

Authors:  Y Ilker; T Tarcan; F Simşek; A Akdaş
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for upper ureter stones.

Authors:  Byong Chang Jeong; Hyeung Keun Park; Seok Soo Byeon; Hyeon Hoe Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.153

7.  The role of laparoscopic surgery for renal calculi management.

Authors:  Kittinut Kijvikai
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2011-02

8.  The stone surgeon in the mirror: how are German-speaking urologists treating large renal stones today?

Authors:  Martin Schoenthaler; Simon Hein; Christian Seitz; Christian Türk; Hansjörg Danuser; Werner Vach; Arkadiusz Miernik
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Open stone surgery: is it still a preferable procedure in the management of staghorn calculi?

Authors:  A A Esen; Z Kirkali; C Güler
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.370

10.  Comparative study of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of large renal pelvic stones.

Authors:  Yasser M Haggag; Gamal Morsy; Magdy M Badr; Abdel Baset A Al Emam; Mourad Farid; Mohamed Etafy
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.