Literature DB >> 11872020

Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy: technical considerations and long-term follow-up.

D D Gaur1, S Trivedi, M R Prabhudesai, H R Madhusudhana, M Gopichand.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the technical details and the long-term results of laparoscopic ureterolithotomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy was undertaken in 101 patients between 1991 and 2001; in only one patient with retroperitoneal fibrous adhesions was the procedure transperitoneal, being retroperitoneal in all the others, using Gaur's balloon retroperitoneoscopy. The mean (range) stone size was 16 (10-47) mm, and the stones were in the upper ureter in 75, mid-ureter in 11 and lower ureter in 15 patients. Nine patients had more than one stone, the maximum being six, in a megaureter. Most were impacted for > 2 months, the maximum being 240 months.
RESULTS: Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy was successful in 93 patients, with the eight failures being mostly early in the series. The mean operative duration was 79 min (66 min when the ureter was left open and 92 min when it was sutured). The overall mean duration of urinary leakage was 5.5 days, which was reduced to 3.2 days by stenting and suturing the ureter. The mean (range) blood loss was 25 (5-100) mL. The overall complication rate was high (31%) because of prolonged urinary leakage in 20 patients. No patient required morphine for pain relief and the mean for oral analgesic use was 2.5 days. The mean hospital stay was 3.5 days and that for resuming work 14 (7-28) days.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy by the retroperitoneal approach is a safe and reliable minimally invasive procedure. Although its role as a salvage procedure for failed extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy is undisputed, in selected patients with large chronically impacted ureteric stones and particularly with solitary kidneys, it may be considered the first-line treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11872020     DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-4096.2001.01562.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  28 in total

1.  Application of a temporary ureter clamp for retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy.

Authors:  Xingqiao Wen; Xiaojuan Li; Jie Situ; Youqiang Fang; Xiaodong Chen; Xingxing Ruan; Yu Wang; Xin Gao
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Retroperitoneoscopic versus open mini-incision ureterolithotomy for upper- and mid-ureteric stones: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Jai Prakash; Vishwajeet Singh; Manoj Kumar; Manoj Kumar; Rahul Janak Sinha; Satyanarayan Sankhwar
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-11-23       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 3.  [Importance of open and laparoscopic stone surgery].

Authors:  M Hruza; C Türk; T Frede; J Rassweiler
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 4.  The role of open and laparoscopic stone surgery in the modern era of endourology.

Authors:  Michael S Borofsky; James E Lingeman
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  Prospective Randomized Comparison of Open versus Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy: Experience of a Single Center from Northern India.

Authors:  Manish Garg; Vishwajeet Singh; Rahul J Sinha; Satya N Sankhwar; Manoj Kumar; Amit Kumar; Jai Prakash; Pradeep Kumar; Mohit Pandey
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2013-10-30

6.  Experience with retroperitoneoscopy in pediatric surgical oncology.

Authors:  Till M Theilen; Thambipillai Sri Paran; Daniel Rutigliano; Leonard Wexler; Yukio Sonoda; Michael P LaQuaglia
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for upper ureter stones.

Authors:  Byong Chang Jeong; Hyeung Keun Park; Seok Soo Byeon; Hyeon Hoe Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.153

8.  Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy; which is better: Transperitoneal or retroperitoneal approach?

Authors:  Mostafa Khalil; Rabea Omar; Shabieb Abdel-Baky; Ahmed Mohey; Ahmed Sebaey
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2015-12

9.  Laparoscopic nephrolithotomy in a patient with crossed fused renal ectopia.

Authors:  Alireza Aminsharifi; Reza Niroomand; Mohsen Kroup; Mohammad Mehdi Hosseini
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 14.432

10.  Robotic extended pyelolithotomy for complete staghorn calculus.

Authors:  Rene Sotelo; Juan Carlos Astigueta; Camilo Giedelman; Robert de Andrade; Oswaldo Carmona; Daniel Ramirez; Rafael Clavijo
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2010-05-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.