Literature DB >> 16775211

Differential controls over tactile detection in humans by motor commands and peripheral reafference.

C Elaine Chapman1, Evelyne Beauchamp.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which motor commands and peripheral reafference differentially control the detection of near-threshold, tactile stimuli. Detection of weak electrical stimuli applied to the index finger (D2) was evaluated with two bias-free measures of sensory detection, the index of detectability (d') and the proportion of stimuli detected. Stimuli were presented at different delays prior to and during two motor tasks, D2 abduction, and elbow extension; both tasks were tested in two modes, active and passive. For both active tasks, the peak decrease in tactile suppression occurred at the onset of electromyographic activity. The time course for the suppression of detection during active and passive D2 abduction was identical, and preceded the onset of movement (respectively, -35 and -47 ms). These results suggest that movement reafference alone, acting through a mechanism of backward masking, could explain the modulation seen with D2 movement. In contrast, tactile suppression was significantly earlier for active elbow movements (-59 ms) as compared with passive (-21 ms), an observation consistent with both the motor command and peripheral reafference contributing to the suppression of detection of stimuli applied to D2 during movements about a proximal joint. A role for the motor command in tactile gating during distal movements cannot be discounted, however, because differences in the strength and distribution of the peripheral reafference may also have contributed to the proximo-distal differences in the timing of the suppression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16775211     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00214.2006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  23 in total

1.  Perceptual constancy of texture roughness in the tactile system.

Authors:  Takashi Yoshioka; James C Craig; Graham C Beck; Steven S Hsiao
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Vibrotactile stimulation of fast-adapting cutaneous afferents from the foot modulates proprioception at the ankle joint.

Authors:  Robyn L Mildren; Leah R Bent
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2016-01-28

3.  Haptic discrimination of two-dimensional angles: influence of exploratory strategy.

Authors:  Myriam Levy; Stéphanie Bourgeon; C Elaine Chapman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Task-dependent modulation of primary afferent depolarization in cervical spinal cord of monkeys performing an instructed delay task.

Authors:  Kazuhiko Seki; Steve I Perlmutter; Eberhard E Fetz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Neural correlates of tactile perception during pre-, peri-, and post-movement.

Authors:  Georgiana Juravle; Tobias Heed; Charles Spence; Brigitte Röder
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  A critical speed for gating of tactile detection during voluntary movement.

Authors:  Anita Cybulska-Klosowicz; El-Mehdi Meftah; Mélissa Raby; Marie-Line Lemieux; C Elaine Chapman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  Tactile suppression in goal-directed movement.

Authors:  Georgiana Juravle; Gordon Binsted; Charles Spence
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08

8.  Perceptual and decisional attenuation of tactile perception during the preparation of self- versus externally-generated movements.

Authors:  Georgiana Juravle; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Directional acuity of whole-body perturbations during standing balance.

Authors:  M Jane Puntkattalee; Clarissa J Whitmire; Alix S Macklin; Garrett B Stanley; Lena H Ting
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 2.840

10.  Real-time decreased sensitivity to an audio-visual illusion during goal-directed reaching.

Authors:  Luc Tremblay; Thanh Nguyen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.