Literature DB >> 16770855

Critical comparison of laparoscopic, robotic, and open radical prostatectomy: techniques, outcomes, and cost.

Matthew T Gettman1, Michael L Blute.   

Abstract

Radical prostatectomy has maintained paramount importance in prostate cancer management. Emerging alternative treatments are laparoscopic and robotic prostatectomy. Technical modifications have improved radical prostatectomy outcomes, yet surgery remains difficult to perform regardless of approach. Contemporary series have shown comparable outcomes with operative time, transfusion rates, analgesia, and length of catheterization. Open radical prostatectomy provides excellent long-term oncologic control, but sparse short-term data are available for laparoscopic and robotic prostatectomy. Favorable outcomes also have been reported for urinary control and sexual function, regardless of approach. Additional prospective data collection is needed to evaluate if minimally invasive approaches provide distinct advantages over open surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16770855     DOI: 10.1007/s11934-006-0021-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Urol Rep        ISSN: 1527-2737            Impact factor:   3.092


  47 in total

1.  Radical retropubic versus laparoscopic prostatectomy: a prospective comparison of functional outcome.

Authors:  Aristotelis G Anastasiadis; Laurent Salomon; Ran Katz; Andras Hoznek; Dominique Chopin; Clement-Claude Abbou
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparison of one surgeon's outcomes.

Authors:  Thomas E Ahlering; David Woo; Louis Eichel; David I Lee; Robert Edwards; Douglas W Skarecky
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 3.  Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy, a technique of robotic radical prostatectomy for management of localized carcinoma of the prostate: experience of over 1100 cases.

Authors:  Mani Menon; Ashutosh Tewari; James O Peabody; Alok Shrivastava; Sanjeev Kaul; Akshay Bhandari; Ashok K Hemal
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.241

4.  Laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy: what are the real advantages?

Authors:  S Duke Herrell; Joseph A Smith
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  Radical prostatectomy for clinically advanced (cT3) prostate cancer since the advent of prostate-specific antigen testing: 15-year outcome.

Authors:  John F Ward; Jeffrey M Slezak; Michael L Blute; Erik J Bergstralh; Horst Zincke
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  Robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus retropubic radical prostatectomy: a prospective assessment of postoperative pain.

Authors:  Todd M Webster; S Duke Herrell; Sam S Chang; Michael S Cookson; Roxelyn G Baumgartner; Laura W Anderson; Joseph A Smith
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Prospective longitudinal comparative study of health-related quality of life in patients undergoing invasive treatments for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Douglas W Soderdahl; John W Davis; Paul F Schellhammer; Robert W Given; Donald F Lynch; Mark Shaves; Bonnie L Burke; Michael D Fabrizio
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.942

8.  Lateral pedicle control during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: refined technique.

Authors:  Inderbir S Gill; Osamu Ukimura; Mauricio Rubinstein; Antonio Finelli; Alireza Moinzadeh; Dinesh Singh; Jihad Kaouk; Tsuneharu Miki; Mihir Desai
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  A comparison of minimally invasive open and laparoscopic radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Thomas K Slabaugh; Fray F Marshall
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Nerve sparing radical prostatectomy: effects of hemostatic energy sources on the recovery of cavernous nerve function in a canine model.

Authors:  Albert M Ong; Li-Ming Su; Ioannis Varkarakis; Takeshi Inagaki; Richard E Link; Sam B Bhayani; Alex Patriciu; Barbara Crain; Patrick C Walsh
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  8 in total

1.  Are hospitals "keeping up with the Joneses"?: Assessing the spatial and temporal diffusion of the surgical robot.

Authors:  Huilin Li; Mitchell H Gail; R Scott Braithwaite; Heather T Gold; Dawn Walter; Mengling Liu; Cary P Gross; Danil V Makarov
Journal:  Healthc (Amst)       Date:  2014-07

2.  Incidence and location of positive surgical margins following open, pure laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy and its relation with neurovascular preservation: a single-institution experience.

Authors:  W Villamil; N Billordo Peres; P Martinez; C Giudice; J Liyo; P García Marchiñena; A Jurado; O Damia
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2012-02-01

3.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic transvesical diverticulectomy and simple prostatectomy.

Authors:  James S Magera; M Adam Childs; Igor Frank
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2008-07-26

4.  Bladder Neck Contracture Following Radical Retropubic versus Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Benjamin L Spector; Nathan A Brooks; Michael E Strigenz; James A Brown
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2017-07-30

5.  Advances in robotic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Stephen A Boorjian; Matthew T Gettman
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Health-related quality of life in robotic versus open radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Stacy Rush; Shabbir M H Alibhai; Lizhen Xu; Wei Xu; Alyssa S Louis; Andrew G Matthew; Michael Nesbitt; Antonio Finelli; Neil E Fleshner; Robert J Hamilton; Girish Kulkarni; Alexandre Zlotta; Michael A S Jewett; John Trachtenberg
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.862

7.  Prevalence of erectile dysfunction in male survivors of cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies.

Authors:  Damiano Pizzol; Tao Xiao; Lee Smith; Guillermo F López Sánchez; Andrea Garolla; Christopher Parris; Yvonne Barnett; Petre Cristian Ilie; Pinar Soysal; Jae Il Shin; Mark A Tully; Lin Yang; Nicola Veronese; Igor Grabovac
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  4-Ports endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: preliminary and learning curve results.

Authors:  Humberto do Nascimento Barbosa; Tiberio Moreno Siqueira; Francualdo Barreto; Leonardo Gomes Menezes; Mauro Jose Catunda Luna; Adriano Almeida Calado
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.541

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.