Literature DB >> 16764899

Development and evaluation of a linear staircase strategy for the measurement of perimetric sensitivity.

Rizwan Malik1, William H Swanson, David F Garway-Heath.   

Abstract

Perimetric sensitivity of patients with glaucoma has traditionally been measured in logarithmic (dB) units, but linear sensitivity correlates better with conventional structural measures of glaucomatous damage. Monte Carlo simulations of perimetric algorithms were used to assess potential effects of logarithmic steps on bias and variability when perimetric sensitivity was represented in linear units, and to assess the potential benefits of algorithms using linear steps. Simulations predicted that linear staircases could reduce the sensitivity-dependence of bias, variability and efficiency. These predictions were supported by a perimetric study of 21 patients with glaucoma and 20 age-similar controls who made repeat visits over several weeks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16764899      PMCID: PMC2430742          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.03.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  29 in total

1.  Measurement error of visual field tests in glaucoma.

Authors:  P G D Spry; C A Johnson; A M McKendrick; A Turpin
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Anatomy of a supergroup: does a criterion of normal perimetric performance generate a supernormal population?

Authors:  Andrew John Anderson; Chris A Johnson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from full threshold, ZEST, and SITA-like strategies, as determined by computer simulation.

Authors:  Andrew Turpin; Allison M McKendrick; Chris A Johnson; Algis J Vingrys
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Perimetric defects and ganglion cell damage: interpreting linear relations using a two-stage neural model.

Authors:  William H Swanson; Joost Felius; Fei Pan
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from Full Threshold, SITA Standard, and SITA Fast strategies.

Authors:  Paul H Artes; Aiko Iwase; Yuko Ohno; Yoshiaki Kitazawa; Balwantray C Chauhan
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Modeling the dynamics of light adaptation: the merging of two traditions.

Authors:  N Graham; D C Hood
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Normal variability of static perimetric threshold values across the central visual field.

Authors:  A Heijl; G Lindgren; J Olsson
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1987-11

8.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Characteristics of frequency-of-seeing curves in normal subjects, patients with suspected glaucoma, and patients with glaucoma.

Authors:  B C Chauhan; J D Tompkins; R P LeBlanc; T A McCormick
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Evaluation of a two-stage neural model of glaucomatous defect: an approach to reduce test-retest variability.

Authors:  Fei Pan; William H Swanson; Mitchell W Dul
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.973

View more
  6 in total

1.  Variability of visual field measurements is correlated with the gradient of visual sensitivity.

Authors:  Harry J Wyatt; Mitchell W Dul; William H Swanson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Assessment of linear-scale indices for perimetry in terms of progression in early glaucoma.

Authors:  Stuart K Gardiner; Shaban Demirel; Chris A Johnson; William H Swanson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Estimating the rate of retinal ganglion cell loss in glaucoma.

Authors:  Felipe A Medeiros; Linda M Zangwill; Douglas R Anderson; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Christopher A Girkin; Ronald S Harwerth; Marie-Josée Fredette; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Assessment of the reliability of standard automated perimetry in regions of glaucomatous damage.

Authors:  Stuart K Gardiner; William H Swanson; Deborah Goren; Steven L Mansberger; Shaban Demirel
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Testing the visual field of children and adults with Rarebit: The role of task repetition on sensitivity.

Authors:  Iryna Tachyla; Luca Battaglini; Michele Barollo; Simone Cosentino; Giulio Contemori; Luisa Pinello; Ambra Ciavarelli; Clara Casco
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Detecting changes in retinal function: Analysis with Non-Stationary Weibull Error Regression and Spatial enhancement (ANSWERS).

Authors:  Haogang Zhu; Richard A Russell; Luke J Saunders; Stefano Ceccon; David F Garway-Heath; David P Crabb
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.