Literature DB >> 16763871

Bone loss after total hip arthroplasty.

Diana Dan1, David Germann, Hubert Burki, Peter Hausner, Urs Kappeler, Rainer Peter Meyer, Richard Klaghofer, Thomas Stoll.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study is to evaluate periprosthetic bone loss and to compare it with the bone loss in other areas of the body. We also aim to shed light on the course of bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with cemented femoral prosthesis in comparison with those with uncemented ones. We analyzed the BMD using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) in a consecutively recruited convenience sample of 50 patients with cemented and uncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA). BMD was measured within the first month after surgery as well as 1 year later. In ten of the patients (20%) previously undiagnosed osteoporosis was revealed. Osteoporosis was significantly more frequently detected in patients with cemented compared to those with uncemented femoral stem. We found a significant loss in BMD in the periprosthetic femoral region compared with no losses in other body regions (lumbar spine, radius, contralateral hip). The magnitude of this loss was the highest in Gruen-Zone 7 (mean 15.2% per year). We found no BMD loss difference between patients with cemented and uncemented prosthesis in the Gruen-Zone 2-7. In conclusion these periprosthetic losses may be due to local factors such as periprosthetic bone remodeling, as they contrast with the course of BMD in the lumbar spine, radius and not operated hip.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16763871     DOI: 10.1007/s00296-005-0077-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatol Int        ISSN: 0172-8172            Impact factor:   2.631


  16 in total

1.  Monitoring of periprosthetic BMD after uncemented total hip arthroplasty with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry--a 3-year follow-up study.

Authors:  P K Venesmaa; H P Kröger; H J Miettinen; J S Jurvelin; O T Suomalainen; E M Alhava
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Determination of bone mineral density by dual x-ray absorptiometry in patients with uncemented total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  B J Kiratli; J P Heiner; A A McBeath; M A Wilson
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 3.  Bone density at the proximal femur after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  H Kröger; P Venesmaa; J Jurvelin; H Miettinen; O Suomalainen; E Alhava
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Evaluation of periprosthetic bone using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry: precision of the method and effect of operation on bone mineral density.

Authors:  H Kröger; H Miettinen; I Arnala; E Koski; N Rushton; O Suomalainen
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Maintenance of proximal bone mass with an uncemented femoral stem analysis with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  R L Wixson; S D Stulberg; G J Van Flandern; L Puri
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Longitudinal evaluation of time related bone remodeling after cementless total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  T Nishii; N Sugano; K Masuhara; T Shibuya; T Ochi; S Tamura
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Bone remodelling in the proximal femur after Charnley total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  B Cohen; N Rushton
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1995-09

Review 8.  Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Report of a WHO Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser       Date:  1994

9.  "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening.

Authors:  T A Gruen; G M McNeice; H C Amstutz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Computerized tomographic determination of vertebral density after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  D M Black; A U Daniels; H K Dunn; R A Kruger
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  7 in total

1.  Long-term periprosthetic remodeling in THA shows structural preservation.

Authors:  James B Stiehl
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Applications of finite element simulation in orthopedic and trauma surgery.

Authors:  Antonio Herrera; Elena Ibarz; José Cegoñino; Antonio Lobo-Escolar; Sergio Puértolas; Enrique López; Jesús Mateo; Luis Gracia
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2012-04-18

3.  Densitometric evaluation of bone-prosthetic counterface in hip and knee arthroplasty with modern implants.

Authors:  Andrea Cozzi Lepri; Marco Giorgini; Carla Signorini; Christian Carulli; Roberto Civinini; Maria Luisa Brandi; Massimo Innocenti
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2016-10-05

4.  Periprosthetic bone mineral density with a cementless triple tapered stem is dependent on daily activity.

Authors:  Shinya Hayashi; Takayuki Nishiyama; Takaaki Fujishiro; Noriyuki Kanzaki; Shingo Hashimoto; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Do Rerevision Rates Differ After First-time Revision of Primary THA With a Cemented and Cementless Femoral Component?

Authors:  Kirill Gromov; Alma B Pedersen; Søren Overgaard; Peter Gebuhr; Henrik Malchau; Anders Troelsen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Postoperative development of bone mineral density and muscle strength in the lower limb after cemented and uncemented total hip replacement.

Authors:  Tobias Lindner; Christine Krüger; Cornelius Kasch; Susanne Finze; Wolfram Steens; Wolfram Mittelmeier; Ralf Skripitz
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2014-09-15

7.  Stress shielding effects of two prosthetic groups after total hip joint simulation replacement.

Authors:  Chengdong Piao; Dankai Wu; Min Luo; Hongshun Ma
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2014-08-30       Impact factor: 2.359

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.