Literature DB >> 9678034

Bone density at the proximal femur after total hip arthroplasty.

H Kröger1, P Venesmaa, J Jurvelin, H Miettinen, O Suomalainen, E Alhava.   

Abstract

Recent developments in dual xray absorptiometry have made it possible to quantify bone mineral density changes adjacent to total hip arthroplasty. Even small changes in local bone mass that are not visible with conventional radiographs can be detected using dual xray absorptiometry. Commonly there is a loss of 10% to 45% of the periprosthetic bone mass during the first years after total hip arthroplasty. Recent studies have suggested that this bone loss is not necessarily progressive and some degree of restoration of bone density around implants may occur. Current data suggest that there is active bone remodeling in the proximal femur in response to prosthetic implantation. Such response differs between different stem designs and type of fixation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9678034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  31 in total

1.  Early aseptic loosening of cemented total hip arthroplasty: the influence of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and smoking.

Authors:  M H A Malik; J Gray; P R Kay
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2004-03-27       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Periprosthetic bone remodeling after 12 years differs in cemented and uncemented hip arthroplasties.

Authors:  Prakash Chandran; Mohammed Azzabi; Mark Andrews; John G Bradley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Bone mineral density of the proximal femur recovers after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Matteo Cadossi; Antonio Moroni; Matteo Romagnoli; Eugenio Chiarello; Cesare Faldini; Sandro Giannini
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2010-05

4.  Periprosthetic bone density as outcome of therapeutic response.

Authors:  Giovanni Iolascon; Gioconda Di Pietro; Annarita Capaldo; Carmine Gioia; Salvatore Gatto; Francesca Gimigliano
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2010-01

5.  [Periprosthetic bone loss after total hip endoprosthesis. Dependence on the type of prosthesis and preoperative bone configuration].

Authors:  A Roth; G Richartz; K Sander; A Sachse; R Fuhrmann; A Wagner; R-A Venbrocks
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 6.  Quantitative computer-assisted osteodensitometry in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  R P Pitto; L A Mueller; K Reilly; R Schmidt; J Munro
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-10-17       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Prospective clinical evaluation of 201 direct laser metal forming implants: results from a 1-year multicenter study.

Authors:  Carlo Mangano; Francesco Mangano; Jamil Awad Shibli; Giuseppe Luongo; Michele De Franco; Francesco Briguglio; Michele Figliuzzi; Tammaro Eccellente; Carmine Rapani; Michele Piombino; Aldo Macchi
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 3.161

8.  Five-year DEXA study of 88 hips with cemented femoral stem.

Authors:  Georgios Digas; Johan Kärrholm
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Whole-mount specimens in the analysis of en bloc samples obtained from revisions of resurfacing hip implants. A report of 4 early failures.

Authors:  Ioannis Stogiannidis; Timo Puolakka; Jorma Pajamäki; Teemu Moilanen; Yrjö T Konttinen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Minimal stress shielding with a Mallory-Head titanium femoral stem with proximal porous coating in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Brad Ellison; Nicholas A Cheney; Keith R Berend; Adolph V Lombardi; Thomas H Mallory
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.