PURPOSE: Bortezomib, a selective inhibitor of the 20S proteasome with activity in a variety of cancers, exhibits sequence-dependent synergistic cytotoxicity with taxanes and platinum agents. Two different treatment schedules of bortezomib in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin were tested in this phase I study to evaluate the effects of scheduling on toxicities, pharmacodynamics and clinical activity. METHODS: Patients with advanced malignancies were alternately assigned to receive (schedule A) paclitaxel and carboplatin (IV d1) followed by bortezomib (IV d2, d5, d8) or (schedule B) bortezomib (IV d1, d4, d8) followed by paclitaxel and carboplatin (IV d2) on a 21-day cycle. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients (A 25, B 28) were treated with a median of 3 cycles (range 1-8) for schedule A and 3.5 cycles (range 1-10) for schedule B. Grade 3 or higher treatment related hematologic adverse events in all cycles of treatment included neutropenia (A 52%, B 50%), anemia (A 12%, B 7.1%) and thrombocytopenia (A 16%, B 17.9%). Non-hematologic treatment related adverse events were fairly mild (primarily grades 1 and 2). The maximum tolerated dose and the recommended doses for future phase II trials are bortezomib 1.2 mg/m2, paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC = 6 for schedule A and bortezomib 1.2 mg/m2, paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC = 6 for schedule B. Six (21.4%) partial responses (PR) were seen with schedule B. In contrast, only 1 (4%) PR was achieved with schedule A. Similar proteasome inhibition was achieved at MTD for both schedules. CONCLUSION: Administration of sequential bortezomib followed by chemotherapy (schedule B) was well tolerated and associated with an encouraging number of objective responses in this small group of patients. Further studies with this administration schedule are warranted.
PURPOSE:Bortezomib, a selective inhibitor of the 20S proteasome with activity in a variety of cancers, exhibits sequence-dependent synergistic cytotoxicity with taxanes and platinum agents. Two different treatment schedules of bortezomib in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin were tested in this phase I study to evaluate the effects of scheduling on toxicities, pharmacodynamics and clinical activity. METHODS:Patients with advanced malignancies were alternately assigned to receive (schedule A) paclitaxel and carboplatin (IV d1) followed by bortezomib (IV d2, d5, d8) or (schedule B) bortezomib (IV d1, d4, d8) followed by paclitaxel and carboplatin (IV d2) on a 21-day cycle. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients (A 25, B 28) were treated with a median of 3 cycles (range 1-8) for schedule A and 3.5 cycles (range 1-10) for schedule B. Grade 3 or higher treatment related hematologic adverse events in all cycles of treatment included neutropenia (A 52%, B 50%), anemia (A 12%, B 7.1%) and thrombocytopenia (A 16%, B 17.9%). Non-hematologic treatment related adverse events were fairly mild (primarily grades 1 and 2). The maximum tolerated dose and the recommended doses for future phase II trials are bortezomib 1.2 mg/m2, paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC = 6 for schedule A and bortezomib 1.2 mg/m2, paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC = 6 for schedule B. Six (21.4%) partial responses (PR) were seen with schedule B. In contrast, only 1 (4%) PR was achieved with schedule A. Similar proteasome inhibition was achieved at MTD for both schedules. CONCLUSION: Administration of sequential bortezomib followed by chemotherapy (schedule B) was well tolerated and associated with an encouraging number of objective responses in this small group of patients. Further studies with this administration schedule are warranted.
Authors: Tetyana V Bagnyukova; Ilya G Serebriiskii; Yan Zhou; Elizabeth A Hopper-Borge; Erica A Golemis; Igor Astsaturov Journal: Cancer Biol Ther Date: 2010-11-01 Impact factor: 4.742
Authors: Shing M Lee; Daniel Backenroth; Ying Kuen Ken Cheung; Dawn L Hershman; Diana Vulih; Barry Anderson; Percy Ivy; Lori Minasian Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-02-29 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Danielle A Jandial; William E Brady; Stephen B Howell; Heather A Lankes; Russell J Schilder; Jan H Beumer; Susan M Christner; Sandra Strychor; Matthew A Powell; Andrea R Hagemann; Kathleen N Moore; Joan L Walker; Paul A DiSilvestro; Linda R Duska; Paula M Fracasso; Don S Dizon Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2017-03-22 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Janice M Mehnert; Antoinette R Tan; Rebecca Moss; Elizabeth Poplin; Mark N Stein; Mika Sovak; Kelly Levinson; Hongxia Lin; Michael Kane; Murugesan Gounder; Yong Lin; Weichung Joe Shih; Eileen White; Eric H Rubin; Vassiliki Karantza Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2011-06-16 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: J Portnow; P Frankel; S Koehler; P Twardowski; S Shibata; C Martel; R Morgan; M Cristea; W Chow; D Lim; V Chung; K Reckamp; L Leong; T W Synold Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2011-08-18 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Gary A Croghan; Vera J Suman; William J Maples; Mark Albertini; Gerald Linette; Lawrence Flaherty; John Eckardt; Cynthia Ma; Svetomir N Markovic; Charles Erlichman Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-07-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Danielle D Jandial; Salman Farshchi-Heydari; Christopher A Larson; Gregory I Elliott; Wolfgang J Wrasidlo; Stephen B Howell Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-01-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Bhuvaneswari Ramaswamy; Tanios Bekaii-Saab; Larry J Schaaf; Gregory B Lesinski; David M Lucas; Donn C Young; Amy S Ruppert; John C Byrd; Kristy Culler; Diedre Wilkins; John J Wright; Michael R Grever; Charles L Shapiro Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2009-09-23 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Caleb M Bailey; Daniel E Abbott; Naira V Margaryan; Zhila Khalkhali-Ellis; Mary J C Hendrix Journal: Mol Cell Biol Date: 2008-01-22 Impact factor: 4.272
Authors: Aminah Jatoi; Shaker R Dakhil; Nathan R Foster; Cynthia Ma; Kendrith M Rowland; Dennis F Moore; Anthony J Jaslowski; Sachdev P Thomas; Mark D Hauge; Patrick J Flynn; Philip J Stella; Steven R Alberts Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 15.609