PURPOSE: The copper transporter 1 (CTR1) is a major influx transporter for platinum drugs. However, the accumulation of cisplatin in human ovarian carcinoma cells is limited by the fact that cisplatin triggers the down-regulation and proteasomal degradation of CTR1, thereby limiting its own uptake. We sought to determine whether proteasome inhibition using bortezomib would prevent human CTR1 (hCTR1) degradation and increase platinum accumulation in ovarian cancer cells. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The effects of bortezomib on human hCTR1 expression and cisplatin accumulation were measured by Western blot, flow cytometric, and confocal digital imaging analyses. Platinum accumulation was measured by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry and bortezomib concentrations by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Bortezomib blocked the cisplatin-induced down-regulation of hCTR1 in a concentration-dependent manner and increased cisplatin uptake 1.6- to 2.4-fold. Median effect analysis showed a combination index of 0.37 at 50% cell kill, indicating a high level of synergy. The effect of bortezomib was muted in cells lacking both alleles of CTR1, showing that bortezomib was working primarily through its effect on blocking hCTR1 degradation. I.p. administration of bortezomib produced a peritoneal/plasma area under the curve ratio of 252 in a murine model. I.p. administration of bortezomib before i.p. cisplatin increased platinum accumulation in peritoneal tumors by 33% (P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Proteasomal inhibition prevented cisplatin-induced down-regulation of hCTR1 in ovarian cancer cells and enhanced drug uptake and cell killing in a synergistic manner. Bortezomib shows a large pharmacologic advantage when administered i.p. There is a strong rationale for the combined i.p. administration of bortezomib and cisplatin.
PURPOSE: The copper transporter 1 (CTR1) is a major influx transporter for platinum drugs. However, the accumulation of cisplatin in humanovarian carcinoma cells is limited by the fact that cisplatin triggers the down-regulation and proteasomal degradation of CTR1, thereby limiting its own uptake. We sought to determine whether proteasome inhibition using bortezomib would prevent humanCTR1 (hCTR1) degradation and increase platinum accumulation in ovarian cancer cells. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The effects of bortezomib on humanhCTR1 expression and cisplatin accumulation were measured by Western blot, flow cytometric, and confocal digital imaging analyses. Platinum accumulation was measured by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry and bortezomib concentrations by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. RESULTS:Bortezomib blocked the cisplatin-induced down-regulation of hCTR1 in a concentration-dependent manner and increased cisplatin uptake 1.6- to 2.4-fold. Median effect analysis showed a combination index of 0.37 at 50% cell kill, indicating a high level of synergy. The effect of bortezomib was muted in cells lacking both alleles of CTR1, showing that bortezomib was working primarily through its effect on blocking hCTR1 degradation. I.p. administration of bortezomib produced a peritoneal/plasma area under the curve ratio of 252 in a murine model. I.p. administration of bortezomib before i.p. cisplatin increased platinum accumulation in peritoneal tumors by 33% (P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Proteasomal inhibition prevented cisplatin-induced down-regulation of hCTR1 in ovarian cancer cells and enhanced drug uptake and cell killing in a synergistic manner. Bortezomib shows a large pharmacologic advantage when administered i.p. There is a strong rationale for the combined i.p. administration of bortezomib and cisplatin.
Authors: D Soligo; F Servida; D Delia; E Fontanella; G Lamorte; L Caneva; R Fumiatti; G Lambertenghi Deliliers Journal: Br J Haematol Date: 2001-04 Impact factor: 6.998
Authors: M Markman; B N Bundy; D S Alberts; J M Fowler; D L Clark-Pearson; L F Carson; S Wadler; J Sickel Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-02-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Pedro T Ramirez; Charles N Landen; Robert L Coleman; Michael R Milam; Charles Levenback; Taren A Johnston; David M Gershenson Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2007-10-01 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Paul G Richardson; Bart Barlogie; James Berenson; Seema Singhal; Sundar Jagannath; David Irwin; S Vincent Rajkumar; Gordan Srkalovic; Melissa Alsina; Raymond Alexanian; David Siegel; Robert Z Orlowski; David Kuter; Steven A Limentani; Stephanie Lee; Teru Hideshima; Dixie-Lee Esseltine; Michael Kauffman; Julian Adams; David P Schenkein; Kenneth C Anderson Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-06-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Christopher A Larson; Preston L Adams; Danielle D Jandial; Brian G Blair; Roohangiz Safaei; Stephen B Howell Journal: Biochem Pharmacol Date: 2010-05-06 Impact factor: 5.858
Authors: Peyman Kabolizadeh; Brigitte J Engelmann; Nicholas Pullen; Jennifer K Stewart; John J Ryan; Nicholas P Farrell Journal: J Biol Inorg Chem Date: 2011-09-15 Impact factor: 3.358
Authors: Danielle A Jandial; William E Brady; Stephen B Howell; Heather A Lankes; Russell J Schilder; Jan H Beumer; Susan M Christner; Sandra Strychor; Matthew A Powell; Andrea R Hagemann; Kathleen N Moore; Joan L Walker; Paul A DiSilvestro; Linda R Duska; Paula M Fracasso; Don S Dizon Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2017-03-22 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Yu Qin; Geurt Stokman; Kuan Yan; Sreenivasa Ramaiahgari; Fons Verbeek; Marjo de Graauw; Bob van de Water; Leo S Price Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 8.739