PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to explore the response rate of a first-line, three-drug regimen that consisted of bortezomib, paclitaxel, and carboplatin in patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, gastroesophageal junction, or gastric cardia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with the above diagnosis and acceptable organ function were treated intravenously on a 21-day cycle with the following: bortezomib 1.2 mg/m on days 1, 4, and 8; paclitaxel 175 mg/m on day 2; and carboplatin with an area under the curve of 6 on day 2. Patients received indefinite treatment unless they manifested tumor progression or severe adverse events. All were monitored for tumor response as well as other clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The cohort included 35 eligible patients with a median age of 59 years (range, 36-78) and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score of 0, 1, and 2 in 60%, 34%, and 6% of patients, respectively. Although this regimen was well tolerated, the tumor response rate was lower than that anticipated at 23% (95% confidence interval: 10%, 40%), thereby prompting premature study closure. There were no complete responses. The median survival for the cohort was 8.9 months (95% confidence interval: 5.9, 12.8). CONCLUSION: As prescribed in this trial and for this indication, this regimen does not merit further testing.
PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to explore the response rate of a first-line, three-drug regimen that consisted of bortezomib, paclitaxel, and carboplatin in patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, gastroesophageal junction, or gastric cardia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with the above diagnosis and acceptable organ function were treated intravenously on a 21-day cycle with the following: bortezomib 1.2 mg/m on days 1, 4, and 8; paclitaxel 175 mg/m on day 2; and carboplatin with an area under the curve of 6 on day 2. Patients received indefinite treatment unless they manifested tumor progression or severe adverse events. All were monitored for tumor response as well as other clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The cohort included 35 eligible patients with a median age of 59 years (range, 36-78) and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score of 0, 1, and 2 in 60%, 34%, and 6% of patients, respectively. Although this regimen was well tolerated, the tumor response rate was lower than that anticipated at 23% (95% confidence interval: 10%, 40%), thereby prompting premature study closure. There were no complete responses. The median survival for the cohort was 8.9 months (95% confidence interval: 5.9, 12.8). CONCLUSION: As prescribed in this trial and for this indication, this regimen does not merit further testing.
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Paul G Richardson; Pieter Sonneveld; Michael W Schuster; David Irwin; Edward A Stadtmauer; Thierry Facon; Jean-Luc Harousseau; Dina Ben-Yehuda; Sagar Lonial; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Donna Reece; Jesus F San-Miguel; Joan Bladé; Mario Boccadoro; Jamie Cavenagh; William S Dalton; Anthony L Boral; Dixie L Esseltine; Jane B Porter; David Schenkein; Kenneth C Anderson Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-06-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Cynthia Ma; Sumithra J Mandrekar; Steven R Alberts; Gary A Croghan; Aminah Jatoi; Joel M Reid; Lorelei J Hanson; Laura Bruzek; Angelina D Tan; Henry C Pitot; Charles Erlichman; John J Wright; Alex A Adjei Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2006-06-09 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: B F El-Rayes; A Shields; M Zalupski; L K Heilbrun; V Jain; D Terry; A Ferris; P A Philip Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Manish A Shah; Derek G Power; Hedy L Kindler; Kyle D Holen; Margaret M Kemeny; David H Ilson; Laura Tang; Marinela Capanu; John J Wright; David P Kelsen Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2010-06-25 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Aminah Jatoi; Nathan R Foster; James R Egner; Patrick A Burch; Philip J Stella; Joseph Rubin; Shaker R Dakhil; Daniel J Sargent; Brian R Murphy; Steven R Alberts Journal: Int J Oncol Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 5.650
Authors: Mei Lan Tan; Jer Ping Ooi; Nawfal Ismail; Ahmed Ismail Hassan Moad; Tengku Sifzizul Tengku Muhammad Journal: Pharm Res Date: 2009-04-30 Impact factor: 4.200
Authors: R C Turkington; C Purcell; C R James; J Millar; E Napier; D Law; R Gallagher; M Morris; R H Wilson; M M Eatock Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2013-05-11 Impact factor: 3.850