Literature DB >> 16763043

The statistical computation underlying contrast gain control.

Vincent Bonin1, Valerio Mante, Matteo Carandini.   

Abstract

In the early visual system, a contrast gain control mechanism sets the gain of responses based on the locally prevalent contrast. The measure of contrast used by this adaptation mechanism is commonly assumed to be the standard deviation of light intensities relative to the mean (root-mean-square contrast). A number of alternatives, however, are possible. For example, the measure of contrast might depend on the absolute deviations relative to the mean, or on the prevalence of the darkest or lightest intensities. We investigated the statistical computation underlying this measure of contrast in the cat's lateral geniculate nucleus, which relays signals from retina to cortex. Borrowing a method from psychophysics, we recorded responses to white noise stimuli whose distribution of intensities was precisely varied. We varied the standard deviation, skewness, and kurtosis of the distribution of intensities while keeping the mean luminance constant. We found that gain strongly depends on the standard deviation of the distribution. At constant standard deviation, moreover, gain is invariant to changes in skewness or kurtosis. These findings held for both ON and OFF cells, indicating that the measure of contrast is independent of the range of stimulus intensities signaled by the cells. These results confirm the long-held assumption that contrast gain control computes root-mean-square contrast. They also show that contrast gain control senses the full distribution of intensities and leaves unvaried the relative responses of the different cell types. The advantages to visual processing of this remarkably specific computation are not entirely known.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16763043      PMCID: PMC6675187          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0284-06.2006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  31 in total

1.  Linking the computational structure of variance adaptation to biophysical mechanisms.

Authors:  Yusuf Ozuysal; Stephen A Baccus
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  The accuracy of membrane potential reconstruction based on spiking receptive fields.

Authors:  Deepankar Mohanty; Benjamin Scholl; Nicholas J Priebe
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Contrast adaptation in the Limulus lateral eye.

Authors:  Tchoudomira M Valtcheva; Christopher L Passaglia
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Functional circuitry of visual adaptation in the retina.

Authors:  Jonathan B Demb
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Nonlinear temporal receptive fields of neurons in the dorsal cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  Sharba Bandyopadhyay; Eric D Young
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Population coding under normalization.

Authors:  Dario L Ringach
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Distinct expressions of contrast gain control in parallel synaptic pathways converging on a retinal ganglion cell.

Authors:  Deborah Langrill Beaudoin; Michael B Manookin; Jonathan B Demb
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Contrast Normalization Accounts for Binocular Interactions in Human Striate and Extra-striate Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Chuan Hou; Spero C Nicholas; Preeti Verghese
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  A novel mechanism for switching a neural system from one state to another.

Authors:  Chethan Pandarinath; Illya Bomash; Jonathan D Victor; Glen T Prusky; Wayne W Tschetter; Sheila Nirenberg
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 2.380

10.  Adaptation to stimulus statistics in the perception and neural representation of auditory space.

Authors:  Johannes C Dahmen; Peter Keating; Fernando R Nodal; Andreas L Schulz; Andrew J King
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 17.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.