Literature DB >> 16761138

Characteristics of single and double obstacle avoidance strategies: a comparison between adults and children.

Jessica R Berard1, Lori Ann Vallis.   

Abstract

Activities of daily living often require us to negotiate several obstacles in the travel path. To date, there is little work investigating how adults accomplish such tasks, and there is even less known about multiple obstacle avoidance strategies used by children. The current work will expand our knowledge about the role of vision in adults and children when avoiding two obstacles placed in their travel path under altered ambient lighting. Healthy 7-year old children (n=10; aged 7.51+/-0.2 years) and adults (n=10; aged 22.76+/-1.7 years) were instrumented with infrared markers (Optotrak, NDI) placed on anatomical landmarks and asked to walk along a ten meter path under three conditions: unobstructed, single obstacle, or double obstacle. These trials were performed under two lighting conditions: Full (simulating standard office lighting) and Low (simulating a dark hallway lit by nightlights). Data analyses included lead and trail clearance values, step length, step width and step velocity, take-off distance and Horizontal toe Displacement at Apex (HDA) which was defined as the distance between the horizontal position of the toe to the leading edge of the obstacle when the toe reaches its peak height. Adults were able to maintain consistent behaviour regardless of the number of obstacles in the travel path. Children, however, adjusted their foot placement for the second obstacle. This indicates that having multiple obstacles in the travel path is a more challenging task for 7-year old, and suggests that children at this age may not have fully developed anticipatory locomotor strategies. Children had larger clearance values than adults for the lead foot crossing the obstacle under all obstacle and lighting conditions, and consistently used larger HDA values than adults. Together, these findings suggest that children adopt more cautious strategies than adults in complex environments. Additionally, children decreased walking velocity, increased step width and decreased their step length in a Low light environment. These changes are all indicators of a more careful avoidance strategy, which implies that children at this age rely heavily on visual information to guide foot placements in a complex environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16761138     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0529-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  21 in total

1.  Kinematic analysis of obstacle clearance during locomotion.

Authors:  G P Austin; G E Garrett; R W Bohannon
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.840

2.  Age-related differences in laterally directed compensatory stepping behavior.

Authors:  B E Maki; M A Edmondstone; W E McIlroy
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.053

3.  Locomotor Patterns of the Leading and the Trailing Limbs as Solid and Fragile Obstacles Are Stepped Over: Some Insights Into the Role of Vision During Locomotion.

Authors:  A. E. Patla; S. Rietdyk; C. Martin; S. Prentice
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 1.328

Review 4.  Attention and the control of posture and gait: a review of an emerging area of research.

Authors:  Marjorie Woollacott; Anne Shumway-Cook
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.840

5.  The growth of stability: postural control from a development perspective.

Authors:  A Shumway-Cook; M H Woollacott
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 1.328

6.  What visual information is used for navigation around obstacles in a cluttered environment?

Authors:  Aftab E Patla; Sebastian S Tomescu; Milad G A Ishac
Journal:  Can J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  2004 Aug-Sep       Impact factor: 2.273

7.  Foot clearance during stair descent: effects of age and illumination.

Authors:  Kathryn A Hamel; Noriaki Okita; Jill S Higginson; Peter R Cavanagh
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.840

8.  Visual control of locomotion: strategies for changing direction and for going over obstacles.

Authors:  A E Patla; S D Prentice; C Robinson; J Neufeld
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 9.  Development of anticipatory orienting strategies during locomotor tasks in children.

Authors:  R Grasso; C Assaiante; P Prévost; A Berthoz
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 8.989

10.  Gait adaptation of children with cerebral palsy compared with control children when stepping over an obstacle.

Authors:  Louisa S H Law; Cecilia Y Webb
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.449

View more
  20 in total

1.  Where do we look when we walk on stairs? Gaze behaviour on stairs, transitions, and handrails.

Authors:  Veronica Miyasike-daSilva; Fran Allard; William E McIlroy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-12-25       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Age-related changes in avoidance strategies when negotiating single and multiple obstacles.

Authors:  Catherine R Lowrey; Ashley Watson; Lori Ann Vallis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Effects of singular and dual task constraints on motor skill variability in childhood.

Authors:  Simone V Gill; Zoe Yang; Ya-Ching Hung
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 2.840

4.  Locomotor behaviour of children while navigating through apertures.

Authors:  Kate Wilmut; Anna L Barnett
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Strategies for obstacle avoidance during walking in the cat.

Authors:  Kevin M I Chu; Sandy H Seto; Irina N Beloozerova; Vladimir Marlinski
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Dynamic stability during running gait termination: Differences in strategies between children and adults to control forward momentum.

Authors:  Guilherme M Cesar; Susan M Sigward
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 2.161

7.  The influence of carrying an anterior load on attention demand and obstacle clearance before, during, and after obstacle crossing.

Authors:  Deborah A Jehu; Deanna Saunders; Natalie Richer; Nicole Paquet; Yves Lajoie
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Failures in adaptive locomotion: trial-and-error exploration to determine adequate foot elevation over obstacles.

Authors:  Michel J H Heijnen; Shirley Rietdyk
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Location of minimum foot clearance on the shoe and with respect to the obstacle changes with locomotor task.

Authors:  Kari L Loverro; Nicole M Mueske; Kate A Hamel
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Manipulating sensory information: obstacle crossing strategies between typically developing children and young adults.

Authors:  Victoria Rapos; Michael Cinelli
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.